In a recent viral video, Meghan Markle revealed that her son was left devastated after she refused to buy him an £8,000 camera.
The Duchess of Sussex shared this information during a post-screening chat for the short film, The After, with her friend and filmmaker, Misan Hariman, and actor David Oyolowo.
Meghan expressed how Misan had been teaching her four-year-old son about photography, and she was inspired by his passion.
According to Meghan, her son, who is four-and-a-half years old, was eager to learn photography from Misan.
She mentioned that she had bought him a camera to encourage his interest in the art form.
However, Archie was disappointed because it wasn’t a Leica, like the one Misan owned.
Meghan jokingly stated that she made it clear to her son that he wouldn’t be receiving a Leica, not even for Christmas.
Leica is a renowned German camera brand, and their Leica M11P model carries a price tag of £8,000.
This incident raises questions about whether Meghan truly understands the preferences and desires of preschoolers.
It seems unlikely that a young child would specifically ask for a high-end camera brand like Leica unless they had a deep understanding of photography equipment.
Some critics argue that Meghan’s lack of knowledge about preschoolers is reminiscent of her and Prince Harry’s previous discussions on pregnancy, where they displayed a similar lack of understanding.
Interestingly, Meghan’s mention of Leica in a recent interview can be attributed to two reasons.
Firstly, she has expressed her admiration for Princess Catherine, who is known for her photography skills.
Secondly, the Leica brand has previously associated itself with Queen Elizabeth, featuring the Queen using their cameras on their promotional materials.
This connection might have prompted Meghan to name-drop Leica and claim that Archie is a fan of their cameras.
Critics argue that this is just another attempt by Meghan to secure freebies and partnerships through her son.
Some members of the public find it concerning that Meghan’s supporters, known as the Sussex squad, refer to Archie as “King Archie” and “our nephew” while attempting to pool money together to buy him an $11,000 camera.
This incident highlights Meghan’s discomfort with returning freebies, as she was accustomed to receiving them during her time as a blogger for Tig.
She likely expected this trend to continue or even increase after marrying Prince Harry.
It is worth noting that a bike store faced backlash for gifting a bike to Archie, a child from a wealthy family, instead of those in need.
Unlike the store owner, Leica has been discreet about any potential collaboration with Meghan.
The brand is renowned for its quality and durability, and if Meghan continues to work on her photography projects, scoring a Leica camera as a freebie would undoubtedly be beneficial.
Critics argue that Meghan is using Archie as an excuse to obtain freebies for herself, rather than for her merchandise brand, Merchie.
After all, it is highly unlikely that a toddler would have any knowledge of Leica cameras.
This incident raises further questions about Meghan’s obsession with brands and freebies.
Critics claim that she is once again manifesting her desire for attention and material possessions.
Additionally, it is worth noting that despite her children being so young, Meghan claims they do not participate in any holiday traditions.
Yet, she insists that they possess advanced vocabulary and knowledge on various topics.
These inconsistencies have only fueled skepticism about Meghan’s credibility and honesty.
In conclusion, Meghan Markle’s revelation about her son’s disappointment over not receiving an expensive camera has sparked controversy.
Critics argue that Meghan’s lack of understanding about preschoolers and her apparent desire for freebies and brand partnerships are concerning.
As the Duchess of Sussex continues her endeavors, it remains to be seen how she will navigate these controversies and maintain her public image.