In a recent episode of “Untold Royal Secrets,” host Ben takes a hard look at how Meghan Markle’s supporters are attempting to co-opt the ongoing drama surrounding actress Blake Lively.
This situation, which involves Lively facing serious production challenges, has been hijacked by those who seek to draw unfounded parallels to Markle’s own narrative.
It’s an interesting twist that raises eyebrows and questions about the motives behind such comparisons.
Ben doesn’t hold back in expressing his frustration.
He argues that the attempts to liken these two situations are not only misguided but also trivialize the real issues at play.
When people criticize Meghan, he contends, it’s based on her own words and actions—evidence that is readily available for anyone willing to look.
The stark contrast between Lively’s situation and Markle’s is evident, yet some continue to push this narrative as if they were somehow interchangeable.
The crux of the issue lies in the consistent strategy employed by Meghan’s supporters.
Whenever a public figure faces scrutiny, they seem to swoop in, eager to make it about Markle.
From Amber Heard to now Blake Lively, there’s a pattern that feels orchestrated.
It’s as if they’ve got a playbook dedicated to twisting any controversy involving women into a defense of Meghan’s choices.
When discussing power dynamics, Ben highlights that Lively possesses genuine clout in Hollywood, backed by influential allies like Ryan Reynolds and Taylor Swift.
In contrast, Meghan had royal status and privilege that she ultimately chose to relinquish.
Instead of leveraging that power positively, she has often played the victim card, which has become increasingly predictable.
Looking ahead, Ben predicts that when Meghan’s next project inevitably falters—something he believes is likely—she will again resort to blaming external factors.
Whether it’s online bullying or societal misogyny, the focus will shift away from the quality of her work or her own decisions.
This cycle has played out repeatedly, creating a sense of déjà vu for observers.
The comparison with the working royals serves to further illustrate Ben’s point.
While Meghan and Harry seem embroiled in drama and controversy, figures like Catherine and William continue to fulfill their royal duties without the need for sensationalism.
Their commitment to service stands in stark contrast to the attention-seeking antics that often characterize Meghan’s public life.
Ben takes issue with the audacity of Meghan’s supporters, who attempt to frame Lively’s struggles as a reflection of Meghan’s alleged mistreatment.
He reminds viewers that when Meghan entered the royal family, she was met with open arms and widespread support, including gestures of kindness from the late Queen.
This narrative of being silenced and oppressed simply doesn’t hold up against the evidence.
Since stepping back from royal duties, Meghan’s public persona has been marred by controversies, from the infamous Oprah interview to the disappointing reception of her Netflix series.
Each misstep seems to reinforce the idea that her challenges stem from her own choices rather than external forces.
Yet, her supporters persist in trying to link her experiences with those of other women facing legitimate challenges.
Ben draws attention to the grace demonstrated by Catherine amidst her health struggles.
Unlike Meghan, Catherine has maintained her dignity and privacy, focusing on her responsibilities rather than seeking the limelight.
This is what true leadership looks like, he argues, contrasting it sharply with the attention-seeking behavior often displayed by Meghan and Harry.
He points out the irony in Meghan’s supporters framing every critique as a coordinated attack.
Criticism, he asserts, is a natural response to public actions and statements.
It’s not bullying; it’s accountability.
The hypocrisy of advocating for privacy while simultaneously sharing personal stories with the media is also a glaring contradiction that many are starting to notice.
As the Sussexes struggle to maintain their relevance, Ben feels sympathy for the causes they claim to champion.
Initiatives like the Invictus Games deserve recognition for their positive impact rather than becoming overshadowed by personal drama.
The veterans involved should be celebrated for their achievements, not used as a backdrop for a narrative that lacks authenticity.
Ultimately, Ben emphasizes that questioning Meghan and Harry’s actions isn’t rooted in bias but rather a call for accountability.
When claims are easily disproven, and narratives are inconsistent, scrutiny is inevitable.
The royal watchers are keenly aware of these patterns, and while Meghan’s supporters may try to divert attention, the truth remains clear.