In a recent incident during Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s tour of Colombia, the Duchess of Sussex reportedly found herself in tears after her husband declined to embrace her, allegedly due to visible sweat stains on her clothing.

This emotional moment unfolded following their participation in a digital responsibility event, Foro Future, held in the bustling capital of Bogotá.

As the couple mingled with attendees and posed for photographs, Meghan’s outfit became noticeably damp, leading to what many have described as unsightly marks.

A source close to the couple disclosed that Meghan felt devastated when Harry pulled back from hugging her, citing the sweat stains as the reason.

“You could see the hurt on her face,” the insider revealed, highlighting the emotional toll of the moment.

This incident has ignited a firestorm of outrage and condemnation, with critics accusing both the media and the public of engaging in a blatant attempt to shame the Duchess.

Many observers argue that the scrutiny over Meghan’s physical appearance is a glaring example of the sexist and misogynistic treatment she has faced since joining the royal family.

“It’s absolutely disgusting that we’re even talking about this,” remarked one royal commentator.

“Meghan is a human being, not some perfect, airbrushed doll.”

The reaction to the situation has been particularly harsh, with some social media users mocking Meghan’s appearance and making crude jokes about her sweat stains.

One especially offensive comment suggested that the Duchess should have “worn a diaper” to avoid such an embarrassing predicament.

Such remarks have drawn ire from supporters of Meghan, who point out the hypocrisy in the criticism directed at her.

“Meghan is constantly under the microscope, with every aspect of her life and appearance scrutinized,” one defender stated.

“Yet, when a man like Prince Harry shows up with visible sweat stains, nobody bats an eye.

It’s a clear double standard.”

This sentiment resonates with many who see the disproportionate focus on Meghan’s appearance as indicative of broader societal issues.

Moreover, some commentators have suggested that the attention on Meghan’s sweat stains serves as a distraction from the important work she and Harry were doing in Colombia.

Their visit was primarily centered around critical topics such as online safety, mental health, and the empowerment of women and girls—issues that have long been at the heart of their charitable endeavors.

“This is just another example of the media and the public trying to undermine Meghan and her work,” said a royal expert.

“Instead of focusing on the meaningful discussions and initiatives she and Harry were involved in, we’re wasting time talking about something as trivial as sweat stains.

It’s a disgrace.”

As the controversy continues to unfold, many are left wondering whether Meghan and Harry will address the incident directly.

Advocates for the Duchess have called for a more compassionate approach, urging the public to judge her not by superficial appearances but by the substance and impact of her contributions.

The incident raises important questions about how we perceive public figures, particularly women, and the unrealistic standards they are often held to.

It serves as a reminder that everyone, regardless of their status, is human and susceptible to the natural occurrences of life, like sweating.