In a recent twist of events, Meghan Markle has found herself at the center of controversy during her tour in Colombia.

According to royal expert Neil Sean, the Duchess of Sussex reportedly demanded that staff and event organizers refer to her exclusively as “Madam.”

This insistence on strict protocol, which some may view as excessive, highlights the performative nature of the public life she and Prince Harry have chosen.

Sean’s report indicates that Meghan’s demand is not just a matter of preference; it’s an assertion of her status and authority, even amid a diplomatic visit.

This behavior has ignited a firestorm of criticism, with many questioning whether such actions align with the image of humility and compassion that Meghan and Harry have worked so hard to present to the world.

One royal commentator, who chose to remain anonymous, expressed disappointment, stating, “This is a far cry from the Meghan we’re used to seeing, the one who claims to be all about empowerment and equality.”

Instead of focusing on the charitable causes they aimed to promote during their Colombian visit, the narrative has now shifted dramatically to Meghan’s diva-like demands.

This isn’t the first time Meghan has faced accusations of entitled behavior.

Reports have surfaced in the past detailing her clashes with palace staff over seemingly trivial matters, such as her preference for a specific type of avocado toast.

These incidents have fueled the perception that Meghan prioritizes maintaining a polished image over engaging deeply with her charitable work.

A former palace insider lamented, “It’s a shame, really.

Meghan has the potential to be a powerful force for good, but her apparent need for constant validation and deference seems to be getting in the way.” Such sentiments reflect a growing concern among observers regarding how her actions affect her public persona.

The recent uproar surrounding Meghan’s behavior has reignited discussions about the royal family’s role in contemporary society.

Critics argue that the Sussexes’ insistence on strict protocols and titles clashes with the public’s desire for a more relatable royal family.

One royal watcher pointed out, “The public wants to see a royal family that is in touch with the people, not one that is constantly demanding deference and special treatment.”

In contrast, supporters of the Sussexes defend this adherence to protocol as essential for upholding the dignity and traditions of the monarchy.

A spokesperson for the couple, who wished to remain unnamed, stated, “These are centuries-old customs that serve an important purpose.

It’s not about ego or diva behavior; it’s about respecting the institution and the role that the royal family plays.”

Despite these arguments, the incident has further strained the public’s trust in Meghan and Prince Harry.

The couple has long positioned themselves as advocates for social justice and equality, yet they now find themselves embroiled in a controversy that seems at odds with those very principles.