In a recent development, Prince Harry has come under scrutiny for the whereabouts of his children.

The Royal Family News Channel received messages from concerned Twitter users claiming that Harry is an avid consumer of YouTube and internet content.

While this may seem far-fetched, it could possibly explain his current state of despondency.

Addressing Harry directly, the channel expressed their frustration and urged him to be transparent.

“Harry, where are the children?”

they asked, questioning the authenticity of the blurry doll pictures and photoshopped images circulating online.

If the children are real, they implored Harry to proudly showcase his parenting skills.

Furthermore, the channel raised doubts about Harry’s credibility, referencing past incidents involving him and his wife, Meghan Markle.

They questioned the veracity of claims that the late Queen was playing with Archie shortly before her passing, contrasting it with reports of Harry being alone during a park visit.

These inconsistencies, they argued, do not sit well with the public.

Additionally, rumors surrounding Harry’s current residence were addressed, with some suggesting he spends time in private club bungalows in Los Angeles.

The channel pondered how Harry could bear to be away from his young children, especially considering his gloomy appearance in a widely circulated photograph.

The channel also touched upon the possibility of Harry’s regrets if his relationship with Meghan were to end.

They suggested that a public apology and a cleanup of any controversial issues could potentially lead to forgiveness from the British people.

However, they made it clear that Meghan’s presence would no longer be welcome.

As for the alleged children, the channel urged Harry to take them with him should he decide to part ways with Meghan, emphasizing that they should not be used as a means for financial gain.

In a surprising turn, the channel delved into Harry’s mental and emotional state.

Quoting royal expert Miss Jane, they claimed that Harry had reached a point of no return, mentally and physically.

They attributed this to Stockholm syndrome, asserting that Meghan’s subtle influence over the past six years had deeply affected Harry.

The road to recovery, they argued, could only begin once the relationship with Meghan ends.

The channel speculated on the future of Harry and Meghan’s relationship, suggesting that if they were to separate, there would likely be a cooling-off period before any decisions are made.

The question of where they would reside and the fate of their alleged children remained unanswered.

The channel expressed skepticism about Harry’s ability to negotiate effectively, hinting at the involvement of palace lawyers in resolving these matters.

Moving on, the channel discussed Harry’s ill-fated venture into Hollywood.

They highlighted the stark contrast between his life within the palace walls and the glitz and glamour of Hollywood, which Meghan had promised him.

The channel criticized Harry for tarnishing the reputation of Montecito, the city where they previously resided, and California as a whole.

They emphasized that the majority of Californians do not engage in the behaviors associated with Harry and Meghan’s controversial actions.

Finally, the channel touched upon Harry’s strained relationship with the late Queen.

They revealed that despite her invitations, Harry had failed to visit her during the summer vacation, causing disappointment and heartbreak.

They concluded by urging Harry to reflect on the influence Meghan has had on his life and to consider the impact of her actions.

As the Royal Family News Channel signed off, they encouraged viewers to share their thoughts in the comments section.

They also reminded them to like and share the video, while refraining from asking for subscriptions.

With this, the channel bid farewell, promising to return with more updates in the future.