Netflix’s hit series, “The Crown,” has been making headlines for all the wrong reasons lately.

With its upcoming final season divided into two parts, the show is stirring controversy by featuring the late Princess Diana’s fatal car crash from 1997.

Many have criticized Prince Harry for associating himself with a company that exploits his mother’s tragic story for profit.

However, it seems that money is the driving force behind his decision, as he lacks other qualifications to secure a stable income.

Meanwhile, the show’s writer, Peter Morgan, is fighting back against critics, claiming that esteemed figures like former British Prime Minister John Major and renowned actress Dame Judi Dench are now regretting their initial condemnation of the series.

As the release of the final season of “The Crown” approaches, Netflix is pulling out all the stops to generate buzz around the show.

The first part will be aired before Christmas, with the second part following afterwards.

However, the focus on Princess Diana’s car crash has raised eyebrows and sparked a debate about the ethics of exploiting such a tragic event for entertainment purposes.

Prince Harry, in particular, has faced criticism for his continued involvement with the show, despite its controversial storyline.

While some argue that Prince Harry should distance himself from a production that sensationalizes his mother’s death, others believe that financial necessity is the driving force behind his decision.

With limited career options outside of the royal family, Prince Harry may see this as an opportunity to secure his financial future.

After all, his wife Meghan Markle is unlikely to bring in a significant income through acting.

However, the decision to align himself with a show that profits from his mother’s tragedy has tarnished his public image.

On the other side of the controversy, Peter Morgan, the writer of “The Crown,” is fighting back against the criticism.

He argues that esteemed figures like John Major and Dame Judi Dench, who initially condemned the show, must be feeling foolish now.

According to Morgan, as time has passed, more people have come to appreciate the show’s fictional nature and its departure from historical accuracy.

He dismisses the criticism as mere publicity stunts, aimed at attracting attention and increasing viewership.

In an attempt to add credibility to the show, Netflix has also enlisted alleged royal historians as advisors.

These individuals frequently appear in the media as royal experts, claiming to possess insider knowledge about the royal family.

However, their involvement raises questions about their credentials, as the show often includes outlandish and far-fetched storylines.

It seems that the goal is to create controversy and generate buzz, rather than provide an accurate portrayal of historical events.

As the debate surrounding “The Crown” continues, it remains to be seen how audiences will respond to the final season.

While some may be drawn to the show’s controversial storyline, others may be put off by its exploitation of Princess Diana’s tragic accident.

Regardless, the show’s success and the public’s reaction will serve as a reminder of the complex relationship between entertainment, historical accuracy, and ethical responsibility.

Stay tuned for further updates on this developing story.