Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, made headlines during her surprise appearance at Day 4 of Wimbledon in 2019.

She attended the event to watch William play in his second-round match, marking her second time at Wimbledon as a royal.

Last summer, she also attended with Princess Kate.

However, this visit was marred by an incident involving a man accused of taking a photo of her, which turned out to be a selfie.

Despite the misunderstanding, Meghan’s security confronted the man, leading to a humiliating and unjust extension of her authority.

Comparisons were drawn between Meghan’s behavior and that of other members of the royal family.

It was noted that other royals had never reacted in such a way.

Additionally, Meghan had the area around her cleared, while Kate managed to sit near other attendees every time she attended.

This caused around 40 paying guests of Wimbledon to lose their seats, some of whom may have waited for years or traveled from overseas for the opportunity to attend the prestigious event.

Furthermore, there were rumors that Meghan was not allowed in the royal box due to her choice of attire, specifically wearing jeans.

On top of that, she chose not to stay and watch Andy Murray after watching her friend Serena Williams.

These incidents fueled speculation about Meghan’s behavior and raised questions about her intentions.

In her Oprah interview, Meghan accused palace staff of being discriminatory, claiming they failed to silence the media to protect her from negative coverage.

She argued that if it were Kate in her place, the palace would have defended her.

However, it is important to note that Kate has never exhibited the same behavior as Meghan.

Moreover, Meghan was aware of the royal family’s no-complain, no-explain policy, which prevented them from refuting her claims.

This allowed her to manipulate public opinion and portray herself as a victim, garnering sympathy from the public.

In a recent revelation, an expert stated that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are not making sufficient efforts to reconcile with the royal family, despite publicly declaring this year as their year of redemption.

Royal expert Phil Dampier expressed skepticism towards their intentions, dismissing their plans as mere words without actions to back them up.

He emphasized the importance of actions speaking louder than words and urged Harry and Meghan to take concrete steps to convince the public of their desire for redemption.

Dampier further highlighted the contrast between the royal family’s show of unity during Christmas, where even Prince Andrew’s ex-wife, Fergie, was allowed to join them for church and lunch.

The message conveyed was clear: everyone was welcome except Harry and Meghan.

This exclusion further strained the relationship between the couple and the royal family.