Meghan Furious as King Charles Announces Parliament’s Decision to Strip Lilibet’s Title

In a surprising turn of events, King Charles has made a bold announcement regarding the title of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s daughter, Lilibet.

It seems that the King is determined to interpret the liberty protection as the status of children at birth, and even if his interpretation is incorrect, he has the power to issue new liberty protections.

This means that the law will soon change, and Lilibet and her brother Archie will not be entitled to any royal titles.

Interestingly, King Charles is not seeking to add more titles to the already extensive list.

On the contrary, he wants to reduce the number of titles within the royal family.

This decision has sparked a heated debate, with some questioning the significance of these titles in the first place.

One argument against bestowing titles upon Lilibet and Archie is the fact that King Charles may not be around for the next two decades.

By the time the children reach adulthood, it is highly likely that Prince William will be the reigning monarch.

In light of this, many wonder what purpose these titles would serve.

Moreover, attempting to use these titles as leverage on the Duke and Duchess of Sussex is not a wise move.

There is no guarantee that this will prevent them from speaking out about the British Royal Family and potentially tarnishing the reputation associated with these titles.

It seems that criticizing the monarchy has become their primary talent.

Another important consideration is the question of whether these titles hold any value for Lilibet and Archie, who are growing up in the United States without direct involvement or understanding of the royal family.

They have no roles or responsibilities within the monarchy.

Are these titles merely a means of merchandising?

This situation brings to mind the heir to the exiled Italian royal family, who shamelessly used his own coat of arms as a logo for his fast-food pasta business in California.

Such actions are seen as disgraceful, and it appears that Meghan Markle may be pursuing a similar path of commercialization.

It is clear that Meghan would seize every opportunity to parade her children around for the highest bidder, all the while claiming their privacy and normalcy.

She would undoubtedly refer to them as “my son, Prince Archie” or “my daughter, Princess Lilibet” at every chance she gets, rather than simply using their names or referring to them as her children.

King Charles seems to be aware of Meghan’s intentions and the potential for merchandising.

This awareness may explain why he has decided not to grant the titles to Lilibet and Archie.