Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have been labeled as some of the biggest losers in Tinseltown this year, according to industry magazine, the Hollywood Reporter.
In its 2023 review, the magazine celebrated the triumphs of certain individuals while highlighting those who failed to make an impact.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex were among the eleven chosen for their struggles, particularly due to their criticized Netflix documentary, biography, and podcast.
The Hollywood Reporter did not hold back in its assessment of the couple, stating that they had abandoned their life of ceremonial public service to cash in on their celebrity status in the United States, but ultimately failed to make a significant impact.
Adding to their woes, the couple’s charitable foundation, Archwell, experienced a staggering $11 million decline in donations over the past year, resulting in financial losses.
Meanwhile, their right-hand man, James Holt, received a massive 280% pay raise.
In the midst of this, a crisis meeting was reported to be taking place in Los Angeles with WME, a prominent talent agency.
Speculation arose that Meghan Markle, who now handles her own public relations, had to consult with representatives before releasing their Christmas card.
However, it seems that WME leaders and staff wanted to cancel the card altogether.
Although the connection between the crisis meeting and the Christmas card remains unclear, it is worth noting that the card had not been released by Wednesday morning.
There are suggestions that the crisis meeting may be addressing recent issues related to Scobie’s book.
It is believed that WME discovered the couple’s cooperation with the book while being told otherwise.
The couple’s failure to distance themselves from the book, which contains negative sentiments towards the monarchy, has raised eyebrows.
The idea of releasing a Christmas card in poor taste, especially one that photoshops the late queen, has further fueled criticism.
WME’s ability to secure work for Meghan Markle has been hindered by her actions, which have made her somewhat radioactive in the industry.
Despite this, her narcissism seems to prevent her from fully understanding the consequences of her behavior.
WME, being an agency with an unpopular reputation, will likely advise her to consider her public relations.
Even if Meghan employs an outside PR company, WME will still provide guidance on how her image is perceived within the industry.
Rumors suggest that Meghan had to pay a retainer to WME for representation, as she was already considered a non-moneymaker at that point.
The term “Markled” had already been coined due to her perceived lack of profitability.
Although the contractual details remain undisclosed, it is believed that Meghan paid a substantial retainer fee.
Additionally, she will owe WME a percentage of any work booked through their agency.
At some point, WME may decide to sever ties with the client if the crisis meetings continue and the drama persists.
It is highly unusual for a client to experience so many self-inflicted wounds and unnecessary controversies.
By now, WME should realize that there is little chance of securing a multi-million dollar deal with Meghan Markle.