Prince Harry faced a setback as his appeal against the UK government regarding his security protection was dismissed by the High Court.
The Duke of Sussex is considering turning to his father, King Charles, to cover the expenses of his private security during his upcoming visit to the United Kingdom.
This development comes after Harry’s failed attempt to challenge the decision that altered his security arrangements upon stepping back from his royal duties.
It has been disclosed by a royal insider that Prince Harry might approach King Charles for financial assistance regarding his security detail when he travels to the UK in May for the commemoration of the 10th anniversary of the Invictus Games in London.
Despite the legal ruling against him, Harry is determined to restore his previous security status and is exploring various avenues to ensure his safety during his stay in the UK.
Following the ruling by retired High Court Judge Sir Peter Lane, it was decided that Prince Harry would no longer receive automatic high-level royal protection but would instead have security measures tailored based on perceived risks, similar to arrangements made for other prominent visitors.
This change in security protocol did not sit well with Harry, who contested that he was being unfairly treated and singled out in the revised security measures.
In response to the claims made by Harry’s legal team, the government defended its decision to reassess the Duke’s security arrangements, emphasizing the need for individualized security evaluations rather than blanket protection.
The Home Office, overseeing these security matters, justified the tailored approach by citing past incidents, including the tragic death of Princess Diana, as influencing factors in the decision-making process.
The court proceedings revealed that Ravik, under the Home Office’s supervision, is responsible for determining security arrangements for members of the Royal Family, with input from various entities such as the Metropolitan Police and the Cabinet Office.
Despite objections raised by Harry’s lawyers regarding the involvement of certain royal aides, the court upheld the decision to review security procedures, deeming it justifiable and devoid of procedural flaws.
In a comprehensive 52-page ruling, Sir Peter Lane affirmed the legality of the security reassessment, dismissing allegations of unfairness or irrationality in the decision-making process.
The judgment underscored the need for a nuanced approach to security evaluations, taking into account the specific circumstances and potential risks associated with each case.
As Prince Harry navigates the complexities of his security concerns, the question of who bears the financial burden for his protection remains a pivotal issue as his UK visit approaches.