Prince Harry made a notable appearance at the coronation of his father, King Charles, this morning.

Accompanied by his cousins Zara Tyndall, Princess Beatrice, Princess Eugenie, and Peter Phillips, Harry arrived at Westminster Abbey.

Inside the abbey, he was seated next to Princess Eugenie’s husband, Jack Brooksbank, and Queen Elizabeth’s first cousin, Princess Alexandra.

However, what caught everyone’s attention was that Harry was seated two rows behind his brother, Prince William, and sister-in-law, Kate Middleton.

Cameras captured a moment when Harry glanced over at William’s direction, seemingly giving him a bombastic side-eye.

Speculation has arisen regarding the intention behind this seating arrangement.

Some believe that it was a strategy to lure Prince Andrew into accompanying Harry and his family, ensuring a drama-free entrance into the church.

Observers noted that Eugenie’s husband, Edo, even placed a hand on Harry’s back, possibly checking for a microphone battery pack.

It appears that Harry was indeed wearing microphones during the coronation, a fact known to the royal family, which may explain why they kept their distance.

According to sources, Harry wore a black suit from the French fashion house Dior, consisting of a black wool and mohair peak lapel tailcoat, a matching double-breasted vest, and trousers.

He completed the ensemble with a crisp white shirt and a grey tie.

Throughout the service, Harry was seen adjusting his collar and tie, and a wire was visible on multiple occasions.

A rectangular box was also noticed under the back of his jacket, making him appear larger than usual.

With the royal family on high alert that Harry might attempt to record their conversations, they chose to avoid speaking with him.

The only interaction seemed to be with Princess Anne’s children, as seen through an open window at Buckingham Palace.

Harry felt humiliated by his seating position, as he believed he should have been closer to Prince Charles and Prince William.

Additionally, it seemed that he was wearing another recording device, possibly a Fitbit on his abdomen, attached to a belt.

Despite Harry’s efforts, no one in the family wanted to engage with him.

It was evident that Netflix’s investment in him and Meghan would not yield a decent return.

As for Meghan, she remained silent throughout the coronation, and little information emerged about Archie’s Californian birthday party.

A source close to the Sussexes revealed to People magazine that it was a low-key celebration at home, attended by Meghan’s mother, Doria Ragland.

Journalist Omid Scobie, who has written a book on the Sussexes, provided insight into Meghan’s absence from the coronation.

He stated that Archie’s birthday was not the sole reason for her decision to stay at home with him and their one-year-old daughter, Lilibet.

According to Scobie, Meghan is also focused on protecting her peace.

She is well aware of the intense spotlight that follows her every move, even when she merely steps near a newsworthy event.

In conclusion, Prince Harry’s presence at King Charles’ coronation was marked by his apparent use of microphones, which led to a lack of communication from other members of the royal family.

The seating arrangement and Harry’s choice of attire raised further questions about his intentions.