In a recent episode of “Untold Royal Secrets,” host Ben delves into the latest controversy surrounding Prince Harry, stirring up quite the conversation about his remarks on the First Amendment.

As he sat on stage, Harry lamented his struggle to reconcile with America’s foundational principle of free speech, and it left many shaking their heads in disbelief.

In a world that feels increasingly polarized, the audacity of a royal complaining about one of the most cherished rights in the United States is nothing short of astonishing.

Harry’s comments came at a particularly sensitive time—amidst ongoing scrutiny over his visa status, which has been called into question due to his past admissions of drug use in his memoir, “Spare.”

One can’t help but wonder about the timing; while dealing with potential legal issues, he chose to criticize the very constitutional freedoms that allow him to reside in the U.S.

It’s almost as if he’s biting the hand that feeds him.

What’s even more perplexing is Harry’s specific complaint about journalists producing what he deems “dangerous or defamatory” headlines.

The irony here is palpable.

Is he referring to the same tabloids that have given him and Meghan Markle countless exclusive stories?

It seems that he only objects to the critical coverage, while conveniently ignoring the favorable narratives that emerge from his camp’s PR efforts.

This hypocrisy raises eyebrows.

Publications like Sky News and Marie Claire have openly acknowledged their connections with sources close to the Sussexes.

Their PR machine appears to be working overtime, feeding positive stories while Harry positions himself as a victim of press hostility.

It begs the question: why the double standard?

He seems to want media attention, but only on his own terms.

And then there’s the baffling comparison he drew between himself and war correspondents or Nobel laureates.

Really?

A prince living in luxurious Montecito, California, making podcasts and Netflix specials, likening himself to those risking their lives for truth?

Talk about a disconnect from reality.

Without the media spotlight he claims to despise, Harry would likely fade into obscurity, known primarily as Princess Diana’s son.

If Harry truly feels so passionately about journalism, why not start his own media outlet?

Oh wait—he essentially has.

He’s built a network of friendly journalists who cater to his narrative, yet it seems that’s not enough.

His desire to control every aspect of the coverage is glaringly evident.

The contradiction is rich; he decries the state of journalism while simultaneously benefiting from it.

Harry’s assertion that he won’t let journalists ruin journalism for everyone else is almost laughable.

This is coming from someone whose wife has a direct line to reporters, ready to share whatever story fits their agenda.

It’s a classic case of wanting to silence dissenting voices while championing a cause that he clearly doesn’t fully understand.

Moreover, the timing of his comments couldn’t be more ironic.

As he faces potential visa complications, he chooses to criticize one of America’s fundamental rights rather than express gratitude for the opportunities he has.

It’s a stark reminder that entitlement can blind one to the realities of their situation.

The First Amendment is not merely an obstacle for Harry; it’s the very foundation that allows him and Meghan to share their narrative.

Without these freedoms, their high-profile interviews and documentaries wouldn’t exist.

Meanwhile, other royals like William and Catherine are busy serving their country, showcasing a stark contrast in priorities.

Every time Harry speaks, it seems he digs a deeper hole for himself.

Surrounded by sycophants, he appears oblivious to how out of touch he has become.

His late mother, Diana, knew how to navigate the media landscape with grace, understanding when to engage and when to hold back.

It’s hard to imagine her reacting positively to her son’s current approach.

Even Donald Trump weighed in on the situation, suggesting that if Harry dislikes the Constitution, he’s free to leave.

That’s a bold statement coming from anyone, but it underscores just how far removed Harry seems to be from the values that Americans hold dear.

His entitled complaints are unlikely to win him any allies in a nation that fiercely protects its rights.

In this ongoing saga, it’s clear that Harry is facing a rude awakening.

His journey in America may not unfold as he envisions, especially if he continues to challenge the very principles that support his lifestyle.

Perhaps a break from the glitz and glamour of California would allow him to reflect on his choices and the persona he has cultivated.

As we ponder this unfolding drama, it’s essential to consider the implications of someone who has thrived in a society built on freedom turning around to criticize those very freedoms.

It raises important questions about character and respect for the values that define a nation.

Harry must decide whether to embrace American ideals or pack his bags for good.

The choice is his, but it’s becoming increasingly clear that he cannot have it both ways.