Jonathan Perkins, the Director of Race and Equality at the University of California Los Angeles, has cast doubt on the recent cancer diagnosis announced by the Princess of Wales.
The controversy arose after Princess Catherine disclosed her decision to undergo preventative chemotherapy for an undisclosed illness.
Perkins, a staunch supporter of Catherine, took to Twitter to express his skepticism, stating that he personally doubts the authenticity of her cancer diagnosis.
He suggested that the Royal Family’s mention of cancer and chemotherapy could be a strategic move to quell concerns surrounding Catherine’s prolonged absence.
Questioning the motives behind the royal announcement, Perkins criticized both King Chuck and Princess Catherine, insinuating that the Princess may be incapacitated or deceased.
He raised suspicions about the timing of the cancer revelation following Catherine’s extended hiatus post-abdominal surgery.
Perkins condemned societal perceptions of cancer, likening it to a perceived death sentence, and accused the Royal Family of leveraging the cancer narrative to suppress speculations about Catherine’s health status.
Known for his outspoken support for the Duchess of Sussex, Perkins has also propagated conspiracy theories regarding Princess Catherine.
He openly denounced tabloid publications for fabricating stories about her and showcased his admiration for the Duchess of Sussex by sharing a royal portrait with a caption declaring his allegiance to her.
Despite facing backlash for his controversial statements, Perkins revels in the social media attention generated by his provocative remarks, even going as far as expressing controversial sentiments about other public figures.
In response to the backlash, UCLA clarified that Perkins’ views did not align with the university’s stance, distancing themselves from his contentious remarks.
Perkins, a cancer survivor himself, highlighted his 15-year battle with lymphoma in a LinkedIn post, emphasizing his advocacy for improved healthcare access for marginalized communities.
Refusing to retract his statements, Perkins remains unapologetic for his divisive online behavior, showcasing a defiant attitude towards criticism.
Perkins’ provocative comments have sparked debates about the boundaries of free speech and responsible online conduct.
As the controversy surrounding Princess Catherine’s health disclosure continues to unfold, Perkins’ vocal skepticism serves as a reminder of the complexities inherent in navigating public narratives and personal privacy.