Inconsistencies and unanswered questions have surrounded the birth of Archie Mountbatten-Windsor, raising doubts about the true circumstances of his arrival.
While some details remain unclear, it is essential to explore where Archie was born and the legitimacy of the hospital’s involvement.
Initially, it was believed that Meghan had a home birth.
However, the birth certificate states that Archie was born at Portland Hospital in London, contradicting this notion.
Adding to the confusion, Meghan and Prince Harry announced their departure from the hospital just an hour after the birth, leaving many wondering about the authenticity of their story.
One of the most significant red flags lies in the accounts of the two doctors who allegedly delivered the royal couple’s children.
The obstetrician who supposedly delivered Archie denied being present, as she was out of town on the day of his birth.
Furthermore, the doctor responsible for delivering Lily abruptly closed their practice, a strange and unexpected move.
These peculiarities raise suspicions about both pregnancies and births.
Moreover, Meghan’s claims about her delivery process have been called into question.
She stated that she had an epidural and then delivered Archie in a bathtub, which experts refute as an impossibility.
It is not safe for women laboring in water to receive pain medication, making her account highly unlikely.
This misinformation suggests that Meghan may lack a comprehensive understanding of the birthing process.
Additionally, Meghan mentioned that Archie was wrapped in a towel and handed to her.
However, experts explain that if a child is born in water, they are immediately lifted out and placed into the mother’s arms, with the umbilical cord still intact.
This contradicts Meghan’s version of events, further undermining her credibility.
It is evident that basic research was neglected, leading to embarrassing inaccuracies.
Furthermore, the idea that Meghan and Harry left the hospital within one or two hours after giving birth is highly implausible.
This hasty departure would be unheard of, especially for a first-time mother and considering Meghan’s age.
The couple’s claims of such a swift exit should prompt an investigation into the hospital’s actions or, at the very least, a response from the institution to clarify the situation and refute any damaging lies.
The circumstances surrounding Archie’s birth become even more perplexing when considering the consuming of Mexican food before an epidural for a geriatric water birth.
These claims, coupled with Harry allegedly being under the influence of laughing gas, raise further doubts about the credibility of the royal couple’s statements.
It is disconcerting that these inconsistencies have not been thoroughly examined, despite many people recognizing their impossibility.
Moreover, the official bulletin from Buckingham Palace announcing the royal baby’s arrival did not include the names of the attending doctors.
This omission has also sparked inquiries and suggests a lack of clarity within the palace’s communication.
Emily Andrews, a royal correspondent for The Sun, hinted that palace aides themselves seemed uncertain about how to address this situation.
In conclusion, numerous questions surround the birth of Archie Mountbatten-Windsor, casting doubt on the accuracy of the information provided by Meghan and Harry.
Inconsistencies regarding the location, delivery process, and involvement of doctors have raised suspicions among the public.
The lack of clarification from the hospital and the palace only adds to the confusion.
It is imperative that these concerns are addressed and the truth is revealed to maintain transparency and trust.