In the latest royal drama surrounding Prince Harry and his memoir “Spare,” accusations have surfaced claiming that the prince intentionally deleted crucial evidence in his phone hacking trial against newsgroup newspapers.

This revelation has sent shockwaves through the royal circles, turning the tables on the prince who has been vocal about privacy violations.

The bombshell accusation against Prince Harry has sparked widespread discussion and controversy.

The prince, known for his advocacy on privacy issues, now finds himself under scrutiny for allegedly tampering with evidence related to the phone hacking scandal.

The irony of the situation has not gone unnoticed by critics and observers alike.

Adding an intriguing twist to the unfolding saga is the involvement of JR Moringa, the ghostwriter behind Prince Harry’s memoir “Spare.”

While Moringa has not directly addressed the accusations of evidence deletion, his past statements have raised suspicions.

In a revealing article for the New Yorker, Moringa provided insights into the collaborative process with Prince Harry, hinting at the extensive communication and exchange of information between them.

Moringa’s revelations shed light on the extensive nature of their interactions, with hundreds of thousands of words exchanged during their collaboration on the memoir.

The sheer volume of content created during their discussions raises questions about the potential evidence that may have been lost or deleted.

The implications of this revelation are significant, casting doubt on the narrative presented by Prince Harry and his legal team.

The mystery deepens as conflicting accounts emerge regarding the existence of previous drafts of the memoir.

While Harry’s legal team claims that all earlier versions have vanished, Moringa’s references to sharing early drafts with individuals mentioned in the book suggest otherwise.

The discrepancies in accounts raise concerns about the transparency and integrity of the memoir-writing process.

The involvement of additional ghostwriters, such as Joshua Lysak, further complicates the narrative surrounding Prince Harry’s memoir.

Lysak’s assertion that ghostwriters typically retain all drafts unless contractually obligated to destroy them highlights the unusual circumstances surrounding the disappearance of drafts related to “Spare.”

The lack of clarity surrounding the handling of draft versions raises suspicions about potential concealment of information.

Revelations from Omid Scobie, a close associate of Prince Harry and Meghan, provide additional insight into the scrutiny faced by the memoir during the editing process.

The extensive questioning by lawyers at Penguin Random House following the submission of the final draft underscores the meticulous review undertaken before publication.

The thorough examination of the manuscript hints at underlying concerns about the accuracy and veracity of the content.

The unfolding events paint a complex picture of Prince Harry’s involvement in the creation and publication of his memoir.

The discrepancies, contradictions, and unanswered questions surrounding the handling of drafts and evidence raise doubts about the transparency and credibility of the narrative presented.

As the controversy deepens, observers are left to ponder the implications of these revelations on Prince Harry’s reputation and the ongoing legal battle.

In light of these developments, it becomes apparent that Prince Harry’s narrative is facing intense scrutiny and skepticism.

The allegations of evidence deletion and inconsistencies in the memoir-writing process have cast a shadow over the prince’s credibility.

As the controversy unfolds, the public remains divided on the truth behind the royal scandal, with lingering questions about the integrity of Prince Harry’s disclosures.