The timing of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s self-promotion of their royal brand has sparked controversy, with concerns raised about the impact on King Charles’ well-being.
The couple has faced heavy criticism for their promotional activities as King Charles deals with a recent cancer diagnosis.
American journalist Lee Cohen has publicly condemned the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, labeling them as an insult to the nation and calling for the removal of their titles.
Cohen expressed disbelief at the couple’s decision to prioritize self-promotion while their family faces significant health challenges, describing their actions as toxic and insensitive.
During an appearance on GB News, Cohen questioned Prince Harry’s judgment, highlighting a pattern of behavior that he believes portrays the Sussexes in a negative light.
He emphasized the importance of considering the well-being of family members during times of crisis, suggesting that the couple’s actions lack empathy and compassion.
Cohen’s sentiments were echoed by GB News host Nana Ackwar, who expressed disappointment in the apparent lack of sympathy displayed by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.
Ackwar highlighted the disconnect between the couple’s actions and the gravity of the situation facing King Charles, emphasizing the need for genuine remorse and understanding.
Prince Harry recently made headlines by giving an interview about his father’s health while in Canada to promote the upcoming Invictus Winter Games 2025.
Although the Duke did not disclose specific details, he conveyed his love for his family during a candid conversation with ABC’s Good Morning America in Canada.
In addition to their media appearances, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have unveiled a new website, Sussex.com, aimed at providing updates on their activities.
The rebranding initiative has drawn criticism from skeptics questioning the couple’s intentions and potential exploitation of their royal connections for financial gain.
The decision to replace their official website with Sussex.com has raised concerns about the commercialization of their royal status.
Speculation has emerged regarding the use of the royal title in a potentially profit-driven context, prompting warnings that any perceived exploitation could lead to repercussions for the couple.
A source cited by Mail Online expressed apprehension about the implications of using the Sussex title for commercial purposes, emphasizing the need for caution to avoid any perception of inappropriate monetization.
The source highlighted the sensitivity surrounding royal affiliations and the potential consequences of exploiting them for personal gain.