The royal christening gown, worn by 64 royal babies over 163 years, has sparked controversy as Meg Moaning’s son is set to wear it, while Lilibet is left out.
The iconic gown has been a symbol of tradition and heritage, with each royal christening being a highly anticipated event shortly after the birth of a young royal.
In a unique twist, a replica of the original gown was created in 2008 to preserve the historic significance of the garment.
Crafted with meticulous detail, the replica closely resembles the original gown from the 1800s, thanks to the efforts of Angela Kelly, the late Queen’s dresser, and her colleague Barbara Bookfield.
The journey to recreate the gown led Kelly and Bookfield to Italy in search of the perfect lace to capture the essence of the original piece.
The late Queen herself took a keen interest in the process, highlighting the importance of maintaining royal traditions through generations.
Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis were among the first to wear the replica gown at their christenings, continuing the legacy of this historic garment.
Buckingham Palace recently confirmed the birth of Eugenie’s second child, a son named Ernest George Ronnie Brooksbank, who is poised to be the next royal to don the iconic gown.
However, tensions arise as Meghan and Harry’s daughter, Lilibet, is excluded from wearing the revered gown.
Despite their request to King Charles for the gown, the couple’s plea was rejected, leading to speculation and rumors surrounding the decision.
The Sussexes’ strained relationship with the royal family further complicates the situation, with accusations of racism and demands for inclusion contrasting with their anti-royal sentiments.
The refusal to send the gown to America underscores the deep-seated rift between the Sussexes and the royal establishment.
The history of the royal christening gown dates back to Queen Victoria’s era in 1841, with the original gown being used for generations until its retirement in 2004.
The introduction of the replica gown in 2008 marked a new chapter in royal christenings, with Lady Louise’s brother being the first to wear it.
Amidst the controversy, Harry’s tumultuous relationship with his family comes to the forefront, fueled by perceived slights and grievances.
His vocal criticisms and grievances against the royal family have strained relations, with the christening gown saga highlighting the complexities of their fractured bond.
As the saga unfolds, the symbolism of the royal christening gown transcends mere tradition, becoming a focal point for familial tensions and generational divides.
The exclusion of Lilibet from wearing the gown underscores the intricacies of royal protocol and personal dynamics within the monarchy.
In the midst of drama and discord, the legacy of the royal christening gown endures, embodying a rich tapestry of history, tradition, and familial bonds.
The upcoming christening of Ernest George Ronnie Brooksbank heralds a new chapter in the gown’s storied legacy, while the absence of Lilibet serves as a poignant reminder of the complexities within the royal family.