The Duke of Sussex has stirred up controversy after his nomination for an award led to a wave of criticism.

Renowned for his transition from a life of service to a pursuit of fame in Hollywood, the American prince recently garnered recognition for his contributions to supporting veterans through the Invictus Games Foundation, which he founded back in 2014.

The prestigious accolade that Harry is set to receive is named after Pat Tillman, an American football player who turned down a lucrative deal to enlist in the U.S. Army post the 9/11 attacks, tragically meeting his end due to friendly fire.

Kinsey Schofield, a royal expert featured on talkTV, noted that the Sussexes had vowed to continue their commitment to serving others upon stepping away from the British royal family, with Tillman epitomizing this dedication.

However, contrasting opinions have emerged, questioning the parallels drawn between Tillman’s sacrifice and Harry’s pursuit of stardom and financial prosperity in Hollywood.

Schofield acknowledged the noble cause championed by the Invictus Games but highlighted its origins within the royal family’s framework, rather than solely attributed to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

The genesis of the Invictus Games can be traced back to the Duke’s observation of how sports could aid in the recovery of injured servicemen and women in various aspects – physically, psychologically, and socially.

This revelation struck him during a visit to the Warrior Games in the United States back in 2013, as detailed on the official website of the royal family.

Amidst the escalating debate, Pat Tillman’s mother has come forward, expressing her astonishment at the decision to honor the Duke with an award named after her son.

She emphasized that Harry is a figure who divides opinions and raises controversy, prompting her to question the appropriateness of the recognition.