A royal expert has expressed concerns over Prince Harry’s diminishing strength, attributing it to his wife Meghan Markle’s authoritative demeanor.

Angela Levin, a prominent author, voiced her opinions during a recent segment on GB News’ Dan Wooten Tonight.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex were honored with the Robert F. Kennedy RFK Human Rights Award for their advocacy against structural racism within the British monarchy.

Levin criticized the couple’s acceptance of the award, citing a lack of evidence to support their claims of racism within the royal family.

Levin remarked that it was disheartening to witness Harry, who previously had a close relationship with his father, Prince Charles, succumb to external influences.

She insinuated that Meghan’s assertiveness has led to Harry unquestioningly following her directives.

The expert emphasized her disbelief that a man would willingly tarnish his family’s reputation without substantial proof.

Levin’s observations echo sentiments shared by others critical of the Sussexes’ actions.

Piers Morgan, a well-known media personality, also condemned the couple’s recognition, labeling it as outrageous and deplorable.

He denounced Harry and Meghan as opportunists who abandoned their royal duties in pursuit of financial gain.

Morgan’s scathing remarks underscore a growing backlash against the couple’s perceived exploitation of their royal status for personal benefit.

Carrie Kennedy, daughter of Robert F. Kennedy, defended the decision to honor Harry and Meghan, emphasizing their courage in confronting systemic issues within the monarchy.

According to Kennedy, the couple risked alienation and backlash by challenging entrenched norms and advocating for social justice.

She commended their willingness to address sensitive topics, even at the cost of facing repercussions from traditionalists within the royal establishment.

The controversy surrounding Harry and Meghan’s award has sparked a divisive response from the public.

While some applaud the couple’s activism and commitment to reforming outdated practices, others view their actions as disruptive and self-serving.

The debate over the true motivations behind the Sussexes’ advocacy continues to polarize opinions among royal watchers and commentators alike.

As discussions on the royal family’s future direction intensify, questions arise regarding the implications of Harry and Meghan’s outspokenness on issues of race and mental health.

Their willingness to challenge institutional norms has raised fundamental questions about the monarchy’s adaptability to modern societal values and expectations.

The ongoing scrutiny of the Sussexes’ motives underscores the complexities of navigating tradition and progress in a rapidly evolving world.

In conclusion, the evolving dynamics within the royal family reflect broader societal shifts towards inclusivity and accountability.