A recent explosive revelation has shaken the royal family, shedding light on a heated exchange between the king and the duke over the duchess, as disclosed by the Globe.

The tension escalated when the king purportedly urged the duke to end his relationship with the duchess, a demand that the Duke of Sussex adamantly refused, much to the king’s dismay.

The monarch scolded the duke for defying his instructions, emphasizing that as a commoner, he does not hold the esteemed status of a recognized royal family member.

Allegedly, the duke dared to question the king about his paternity, leading to a startling disclosure – the king revealed that Mark Dyer is his biological father.

In a bid to substantiate their close bond, a snapshot featured a young Prince Harry in the company of Dyer, evoking a striking resemblance akin to that of a father and son.

Speculations have arisen suggesting that Princess Diana may have clandestinely fostered a friendship with Mark, given their uncanny likeness.

According to an insider, Mark plays a multifaceted role in the duke’s life, not only serving as a mentor and a paternal figure but also as his biological father, as per the source’s claims.

The king allegedly presented compelling evidence to the duke, affirming Dyer’s biological connection to him and further asserted that the duke is not a bona fide member of the royal family, thus granting him permission to part ways with the duchess.

Subsequently, complying with the king’s directives, the duke acquiesced, leading to the king’s swift departure from the castle.

This accusatory episode reportedly transpired mere weeks before the impending arrival of the Suits alum’s child, prompting the duchess’s resolve to unearth the truth.

However, a looming scandal looms as it is revealed that the infant will not inherit a royal title.

The insider suggests that if the king’s claims hold true, the Sussexes could face the forfeiture of their royal titles and potential eviction from the country estate bestowed upon them by Queen Elizabeth in Windsor.

Nevertheless, the credibility of the Globe’s sensational report, published over a year ago, has been debunked, unveiling the fallacy of their assertions.

Contrary to the allegations, the king did not express disapproval towards the duke, nor did he disclose the truth regarding his biological parentage to his younger son.