Speculation has been rife after Twitter users claimed that Meghan Markle may have attended King Charles III’s coronation in disguise.
Despite staying in California with her children Archie and Lilibet, some keen observers believe that the Duchess of Sussex, 41, managed to sneak her way into the event.
The attendee in question caught the attention of many due to their efforts to conceal their identity, leading to online theories about Meghan’s secret appearance.
One Twitter user boldly called out Meghan, stating, “‘Meghan, you’re not fooling us.”
Another person humorously suggested that the mysterious guest was actually Tilda Swinton, the actress from “Snowpiercer,” who was deeply immersed in character.
Comparisons to characters from the popular board game “Guess Who?”
were also made.
One user even joked about the possibility of the Polyjuice potion from Harry Potter wearing off, implying that someone had transformed their appearance.
Contrary to these rumors, Meghan Markle was not present at the coronation.
Prince Harry, 38, attended the event alone, marking the first time he saw his father since the release of his memoir, “Spare,” in January.
Immediately following the ceremony, Harry hurriedly made his way to a car accompanied by a Metropolitan Police escort, aiming to catch a flight back to the United States.
His return would bring him back to a world filled with raising chickens, plotting revenge against the UK press, and launching further attacks on his family.
This departure from the spotlight allowed him to momentarily escape the constant scrutiny.
Meghan’s decision to stay away from the coronation and prioritize her son’s birthday has been praised by experts.
It has been speculated that Meghan chose to remain in California because Prince Archie’s fourth birthday coincided with Charles’s coronation.
Royal author Katie Nicholl clarified that the scheduling was not a deliberate snub, stating, “Having the coronation on Archie’s birthday is definitely not a snub.
I think it’s very much a happy coincidence.”
Nicholl explained that extensive planning goes into such significant historical moments, and the royal calendar is filled with various anniversaries and birthdays.
Insider sources from Minds magazine added that Meghan’s absence at the coronation made perfect sense, allowing one parent to celebrate their son’s milestone while the other fulfilled their royal obligations.
Royal expert Marlene Koenig agreed, stating that Harry and Meghan made the right decision for the moment.
She acknowledged the couple’s predicament, saying, “There’s an expression: you’re damned if you do, you’re damned if you don’t.”
Koenig also noted that Meghan’s absence would shift the tabloid media’s focus onto her father-in-law, Charles, instead of speculating about Meghan’s attire or seating arrangements in Westminster Abbey.
Koenig further elaborated, mentioning that the media had previously fixated too much on Harry and Meghan.
She pondered whether they would have been booed and speculated about their choice of tiaras.
With Meghan removed from the equation, such speculations became irrelevant.
This shift in attention would work in favor of Charles and the extended royal family, allowing them to bask in the spotlight without distractions.
In conclusion, despite the rumors and social media frenzy, Meghan Markle did not attend King Charles III’s coronation.
The Duchess wisely chose to stay in California to celebrate her son’s birthday, ensuring that both parental duties and royal obligations were fulfilled.