In the latest twist in royal news, the financial dealings of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s charity, Archewell, are raising eyebrows and prompting questions about transparency.
Recent reports reveal that the charity’s financial forms were submitted over two weeks late, a concerning delay for an organization that claims to prioritize charitable work.
One can’t help but wonder—what’s really going on behind the scenes?
At first glance, Archewell’s reported income of $5.3 million for 2023 might seem impressive, especially compared to the previous year’s $2.9 million.
However, a deeper dive into the numbers uncovers some troubling discrepancies.
A mysterious $4 million donation has been highlighted, yet the source remains undisclosed.
In a legitimate charity, one would expect full disclosure of donor identities.
So, why the secrecy?
When we subtract that enigmatic $4 million from the total, the reality becomes stark: Archewell actually earned less than it did in 2022.
This raises further questions about the effectiveness of the couple’s star power in Hollywood.
Are they struggling to attract donations despite their fame?
Another point of contention arises from the pay disparity between male and female executives at Archewell.
Last year, James Holt reportedly earned nearly $230,000 while Shona Knapp received less than $100,000.
For someone who champions feminism and equality, Meghan’s charity seemed to miss the mark.
Although adjustments have been made in 2023, the approach appears misguided, with the pay gap only widening.
The situation becomes even more perplexing when examining payments to independent contractors.
Notably, Herali Laughlin and G Craig received significant pay increases of over $40,000 each.
It begs the question: in what context does a charity justify such substantial contractor raises without clear explanations?
Moreover, the disappearance of Invisible Hand LLC, which received over $180,000 in 2022, adds another layer of mystery to the financial puzzle.
Overall expenses for Archewell in 2023 have surged by nearly $1 million compared to 2022.
While the organization may attribute this increase to contractor payments and salary adjustments, many are left wondering where the additional funds are actually going.
The numbers simply do not add up.
International contributions also paint a concerning picture.
Despite Harry’s professed dedication to global philanthropy and his ties to Africa, Archewell only managed to allocate $14,000 to Sub-Saharan Africa.
This is particularly shocking given their previous high-profile visit to Nigeria, where Meghan claimed to have discovered her Nigerian heritage.
One would think that such a connection would lead to greater financial support for the region.
Interestingly, European contributions have seen a sudden spike.
Is there an ulterior motive behind this shift?
Why the newfound interest in Africa in 2023, especially when no funds were directed there in 2022?
The timing raises eyebrows and suggests a possible strategy to bolster influence in certain areas.
This pattern of behavior is alarming.
Meghan has positioned herself as a humanitarian advocate, yet the operations of Archewell appear to be shrouded in opacity.
The couple’s attempts to maintain relevance after stepping back from royal duties have been met with challenges, including the loss of their Spotify deal and lukewarm reception to their Netflix content.
Their foundation’s shaky financial status only compounds these issues.
Ironically, the couple left royal life seeking freedom and transparency, yet their current practices seem to contradict those ideals.
While serving in their royal roles, there was oversight in their activities, which now seems lacking.
The questionable timing of these financial reports coincides with rumors of a comeback in 2024, making the situation even more precarious.
With the IRS scrutinizing these financial documents, the stakes are high.
These aren’t just random figures; they represent official tax filings that could have serious consequences if mishandled.
One has to wonder where Harry fits into all of this.
Growing up in an institution that values financial propriety, has he lost sight of those principles?
The true victims in this scenario are the causes that Archewell claims to support.
Imagine how much good could be achieved if funds were managed responsibly.
As we look ahead, it’s likely that media scrutiny will intensify, and the couple may not be able to escape the spotlight this time.
As we unpack these revelations, it’s clear that the truth surrounding Archewell’s finances is still unfolding.
There’s a pressing need for clarity and accountability, especially for the supporters who deserve to know how their contributions are being utilized.
The questions are lingering, and as always, the truth has a way of surfacing, leaving some in Montecito with much to explain.