Hello, Royal Watchers!
I hope you’re all having a splendid day.
It’s your favorite royal commentator, Ben, back with another episode of Untold Royal Secrets, where we dive into the juicy details behind the headlines.
Today, we’re unpacking some astonishing revelations about Meghan and Harry’s enigmatic children that have left many scratching their heads.
For years, I’ve been tracking this story, and let me tell you, something just doesn’t add up.
Take a moment to consider the delightful images we often see of William and Catherine with their kids—George, Charlotte, and Louis—enjoying polo matches and attending royal events like any normal family would.
Now, contrast that with the Sussexes’ situation, and it’s like night and day.
Neil Sean, a reliable source for royal insights, has brought forth some intriguing observations regarding the recent baptism claims surrounding Meghan and Harry.
Here’s where it gets perplexing: we’re led to believe that Tyler Perry flew all the way from Atlanta with a gospel choir for a private ceremony at their Montecito home.
But why wouldn’t they choose Windsor, a venue steeped in royal history?
The official excuse is that Perry didn’t want to be associated with “those colonizers,” but seriously, are we to believe that someone as image-conscious as he would pass up the chance to be photographed at Windsor Castle?
Speaking of images, isn’t it curious how Meghan manages the narrative around her children?
While she seems to thrive in front of the camera for her own promotion, when it comes to her kids, it’s all about privacy.
This is the same woman who produced a 40-minute video celebrating herself for her 40th birthday.
Let’s talk about documentation—Lady C has tried to verify basic birth information for Archie, but the palace?
Complete silence.
Why is that?
These kids are allegedly in line for the throne, yet there’s no official record or announcement, unlike the transparency we saw with the Cambridge children.
Remember how the world eagerly awaited the traditional hospital photos and birth announcements for William and Catherine’s children?
Everything was documented with clarity and shared with the public.
But with the Sussexes, it feels like a game of smoke and mirrors.
Mainstream media figures, including Dan Wooten, are now starting to voice the questions we’ve been asking for years—questions that Meghan’s PR team has dismissed as conspiracy theories.
But when it comes to royal succession, these inquiries are anything but conspiratorial.
The baptism narrative is particularly revealing.
Reports suggest Meghan wanted to document and possibly monetize the ceremony had it taken place at Windsor.
After all, when has she ever missed an opportunity to turn a personal moment into Netflix content?
The palace, however, wasn’t on board, recognizing that some moments should remain sacred and not fodder for streaming platforms.
Let’s take a moment to reflect on something my grandmother used to say: where there’s smoke, there’s fire.
With journalists like Dan Wooten raising these concerns and even Parliament seemingly lacking documentation on the children, it begs the question—what’s really going on?
The British public deserves clarity regarding future members of the monarchy.
This isn’t about invading anyone’s privacy; it’s about ensuring proper documentation and transparency.
The stark contrast between how William and Catherine manage their children’s public presence versus the Sussex approach speaks volumes.
The Cambridges strike a remarkable balance between privacy and public duty, sharing just enough to maintain a connection with the people while safeguarding their kids’ privacy.
In contrast, the Sussexes seem to release carefully curated images only when they need a public relations boost.
And here’s a twist—rumor has it that Meghan asked Oprah to be Lilibet’s godmother, but Oprah declined.
Why would the media mogul, who provided them with a platform for their explosive interview, turn down such an honor?
Could it be that even Oprah has sensed something amiss in this entire saga?
Now, let’s discuss titles.
The Sussexes insisted on royal titles for their children, yet Tyler Perry, their godfather, supposedly refuses to set foot in Britain due to colonialism.
It’s a puzzling contradiction.
You can’t reject the monarchy while simultaneously demanding its privileges.
Either embrace the whole package, or step away completely.
William and Catherine work tirelessly to represent the crown with dignity and grace, instilling in their children an understanding of their roles and responsibilities.
Meanwhile, the Sussexes seem to operate in a chaotic mix of selective privacy and strategic publicity.
Have you ever felt that nagging sensation when everything seems right, yet something feels off?
That’s precisely what we’re witnessing here.
Every time we try to uncover concrete facts about these children, we hit a wall of privacy claims and misdirection.
However, when it serves their narrative or financial interests, suddenly new information or photos emerge.
This situation is unprecedented in royal history.
Never before have we seen royals claiming titles and succession rights for their children while refusing to adhere to traditional protocols.
It’s reminiscent of a magic trick—look over here while the real action happens elsewhere.
From the moment Meghan entered the royal family, it seems she had a game plan, aiming to replicate Catherine’s success but on her own terms.
Yet she misjudged the essence of Catherine’s approach: authenticity.
Catherine embodies a genuine understanding of the balance between privilege and responsibility.
The Sussexes appear to desire all the benefits of royal status without any of the accompanying duties or scrutiny.
They want to label their children as private citizens while simultaneously demanding royal titles and succession rights.
What do you think about this unfolding drama?
I’d love to hear your thoughts.
Until next time!