In the ongoing drama of the British royal family, few subjects have captivated the public’s imagination quite like the children of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.
Today, we dive into the swirling rumors and theories surrounding this enigmatic couple and their little ones, Archie and Lilibet.
Recent insights from a caregiver, allegedly hired by Meghan herself, provide a unique glimpse into the peculiar circumstances that have fueled speculation about the Sussex family.
According to sources close to the caregiver, she made the journey from California to the UK with the expectation of caring for Archie at Frogmore Cottage.
However, upon her arrival, she discovered something quite unexpected: there were no children present.
Despite her readiness to take on her responsibilities, the caregiver found herself with little to do, as reports indicated that Harry and Meghan were not, in fact, living with their children at Frogmore.
Observations of the couple’s residence further stoke the flames of curiosity.
Photos of the exterior of their home reveal a striking absence of typical children’s paraphernalia—no toys scattered about, no swings swaying in the breeze, and certainly no books left out in the sun.
This lack of evidence has led many to wonder about the true whereabouts of Archie and Lilibet, and even question their existence altogether.
Adding to the intrigue is the couple’s travel pattern.
Harry and Meghan have been spotted jet-setting around the globe, yet they seldom, if ever, bring their children along.
What kind of parents leave their kids behind while they meet with relatives or attend events?
This peculiar behavior only serves to amplify the speculation surrounding their family life.
The caregiver’s story takes a darker turn, as it’s reported that she was compensated to maintain silence regarding her experiences.
Allegedly, palace staff who assisted Meghan during her time at Frogmore Cottage were also silenced with financial incentives, only to be dismissed shortly thereafter.
Such secrecy raises eyebrows and prompts questions about what truly transpired within the walls of their home.
One of the most bizarre and persistent rumors involves the notion of “moon bumps”—prosthetic devices designed to mimic a pregnant belly.
Some palace aides reportedly witnessed these unusual props on the floor of the cottage and even in Meghan’s bedroom.
Whispers suggest that these bumps would sway, deflate, and then re-inflate, creating an odd popping sound during a royal engagement where Meghan was seen greeting dogs.
Could this explain her nonchalance toward the appearance of her bump?
The mystery deepens with the couple’s second child, Lilibet, who has remained particularly elusive.
Reports indicate that no one in the UK has laid eyes on her, and the obstetrician who claimed to have delivered Lilibet abruptly closed her practice this year after inquiries were made about her.
What could possibly explain such a sudden decision?
Among those who subscribe to the more extreme theories are the so-called “Meghan Truthers,” who assert that Archie and Lilibet were conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF) and born via surrogate.
Some even speculate that the Sussexes may not have children at all, suggesting they have used lifelike dolls during rare public appearances.
Samantha Markle, Meghan’s half-sister, has also joined the fray, alleging that Meghan faked her pregnancies.
She insists that the truth will eventually come to light, regardless of the images and narratives presented in the couple’s Netflix docuseries.
A particularly scrutinized moment occurred at a polo match when Meghan was seen holding Archie.
Observers noted her reluctance to bend down to Prince Louis’s level when he wanted to see the baby, which led to speculation that she might have been holding a doll instead.
Many found her demeanor awkward, lacking the instinctive warmth typically displayed by new mothers.
With the tales and theories surrounding Harry and Meghan’s children being as diverse as they are numerous, it’s clear that the public remains captivated.
From allegations of surrogacy and moon bumps to the mysterious actions of their staff, the saga continues to evolve.
Whether any of these theories hold merit is still up for debate, but one thing is certain: the fascination with Archie and Lilibet is far from over.
As we navigate the complex landscape of royal life, the scrutiny faced by public figures often blurs the lines between public interest and personal privacy.
The questions surrounding Harry and Meghan’s children serve as a reminder of this delicate balance.
Regardless of how the rumors play out, they will undoubtedly remain a part of the captivating and often contentious narrative surrounding the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.