In a recent twist in the ongoing feud between Samantha Markle and her half-sister Meghan Markle, a legal document has emerged that mistakenly refers to Prince Harry as the Prince of Wales.

This error, which appears multiple times in court filings submitted to the Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, adds a new layer of intrigue to Samantha’s defamation lawsuit against Meghan.

The blunder underscores the contentious nature of the case, which centers around statements made by Meghan during her high-profile interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2021, as well as claims made in their Netflix docuseries “Harry and Meghan.”

Samantha alleges that Meghan’s portrayal of their family background is riddled with “false and malicious lies,” particularly regarding Meghan’s assertion that she grew up as an only child.

This narrative, Samantha argues, distorts the reality of their shared upbringing.

Interestingly, the title of Prince of Wales is currently held by Prince William, Harry’s elder brother.

The repeated misidentification of Harry in the court documents raises questions about the accuracy of Samantha’s legal team’s understanding of royal titles.

While Harry was indeed born as His Royal Highness Prince Henry of Wales, he became the Duke of Sussex upon marrying Meghan in 2018.

However, after stepping back from royal duties in early 2020, he no longer uses the HRH title in practice.

Samantha’s legal battle began when she sought to challenge the public image that Meghan has cultivated, arguing that it misrepresents their family’s history.

The court filings contend that Meghan’s statements have not only altered the narrative surrounding their upbringing but have also negatively impacted Samantha’s reputation.

She believes that Meghan’s portrayal of her life as a rags-to-royalty story unfairly diminishes her own role in the family dynamic.

Earlier this year, Samantha faced a setback when a U.S. Court dismissed her defamation suit, ruling that Meghan’s comments did not meet the threshold for defamation under U.S. law.

Undeterred, Samantha has appealed the decision, hoping that the Court of Appeals will reconsider the evidence and potentially overturn the initial ruling.

The legal documents also shed light on Samantha’s perspective concerning Meghan’s production company, Archewell Productions.

Through the Netflix series, Meghan has been able to share her side of the story, which Samantha now disputes.

The references to Harry as the Prince of Wales in the filings suggest a lack of attention to detail, which could undermine the credibility of Samantha’s claims.

Legal experts have pointed out that such errors could distract from the core issues at hand, potentially weakening Samantha’s position in court.

The incorrect title not only diverges from established royal protocol but also highlights gaps in the filing process that may raise doubts about the overall legitimacy of the appeal.

It’s worth noting that the title of Prince of Wales is reserved for the heir apparent, a designation that Harry does not hold.

He remains sixth in line to the throne and retains the title of Duke of Sussex, which he was granted by Queen Elizabeth II on his wedding day.

Despite stepping back from royal duties, this title continues to reflect his status within the royal family.

The media has been closely following this unfolding drama, especially given the long-standing tensions between Meghan and her paternal family.

The mix-up regarding Harry’s title has added a layer of complexity to an already publicized legal battle, capturing the interest of royal watchers and legal analysts alike.

As the Court of Appeals reviews Samantha’s appeal, her legal team will likely face heightened scrutiny—not just over the merits of the defamation claims, but also regarding the accuracy of the information presented.

Observers are keen to see how these factors will influence the court’s decisions moving forward.

For Samantha Markle, the misidentification of Harry’s title could be an unintentional hurdle, overshadowing her central argument of defamation.

As the legal proceedings continue, the public remains intrigued by the dynamics of this royal family drama and what it could mean for both sisters.