In a dramatic turn of events, Jessica Mulrooney, once a close friend of Meghan Markle, has come forward to shed light on the financial controversies that surrounded the Duchess of Sussex during her brief time as a working royal.
Mulrooney’s revelations have sent shockwaves through royal circles, suggesting that tensions were brewing long before Meghan stepped back from her royal duties.
According to Mulrooney, Meghan had a calculated approach to her royal life, viewing the monarchy as a means to revitalize her Hollywood career.
From the outset, she allegedly perceived the royal family’s wealth as a launchpad for her ambitions.
At a private dinner in Toronto, Mulrooney claimed that Meghan would often lament about the insufficient wardrobe allowance for someone of her stature, implying that it fell short of what a Hollywood star would expect.
Perhaps the most troubling claims involve Meghan’s treatment of young Princess Charlotte during wedding preparations.
Mulrooney alleges that Meghan insisted on redesigning Charlotte’s bridesmaid dress multiple times, causing distress for the little girl and resulting in extra charges to Prince Charles’ household account.
Rather than focusing on making a young girl feel special, Mulrooney suggests that Meghan was more concerned about curating the perfect image for the cameras.
The financial implications of Meghan’s choices are equally eye-opening.
Mulrooney asserts that the wardrobe expenses incurred by Meghan during her 18-month stint as a working royal outstripped those of Kate Middleton, who served for eight years.
Reports of designer outfits being ordered, returned, and altered at extravagant costs have emerged, with many expenses billed directly to Charles.
Former palace aides have corroborated Mulrooney’s claims, revealing that Meghan’s office submitted expense reports for public appearances that never occurred, with items likely kept for personal use.
One insider described the atmosphere at the palace as fraught with tension, noting that any scrutiny of expenses was often met with accusations of racism or unfair treatment, leading to a culture of reluctant approval for expenditures.
Mulrooney’s narrative goes further, indicating that Meghan sought to establish her own independent office, complete with a dedicated PR team funded by the Duchess of Cornwall.
This ambition reportedly strained her relationship with Prince Charles, who initially welcomed her into the family.
As financial demands mounted, Charles found himself in an uncomfortable position, caught between supporting his daughter-in-law and managing the royal budget.
The situation escalated as Meghan’s requests for additional funding became increasingly frequent, often framed as essential for modernizing the monarchy.
Concerns also arose regarding her intentions for charitable foundations, with allegations that she aimed to redirect royal funds toward causes that would bolster her personal brand rather than adhering to established royal traditions.
Tensions reportedly peaked during the renovations of Frogmore Cottage ahead of baby Archie’s arrival.
Mulrooney claims that Meghan’s lavish demands for the property exceeded the approved budget, calling for luxury features that seemed more fitting for a celebrity mansion than a historic royal residence.
Mulrooney emphasized that it wasn’t just about the spending; it was the underlying attitude that the royal resources were hers for the taking, devoid of any sense of duty or tradition.
These startling revelations provide a fresh perspective on the couple’s eventual exit from royal duties.
What was initially portrayed as a quest for independence now appears, through Mulrooney’s lens, to be the culmination of a meticulously planned financial strategy.
The repercussions of these spending habits continue to resonate within royal circles, prompting the palace to implement stricter financial oversight.
As for Princess Charlotte, sources close to the Cambridge family indicate that she has shown remarkable resilience despite the reported pressures.
However, the incidents during the wedding preparations have contributed to a widening gap between the two royal households.
Meanwhile, palace officials have opted to remain silent on Mulrooney’s allegations, maintaining a dignified distance from the unfolding drama.
The timing of these revelations, coinciding with the Sussexes’ ongoing media presence in America, raises questions about their long-term impact on royal finances and familial relationships.
In a world where every detail is scrutinized, the saga of Meghan Markle continues to captivate public interest, revealing the complexities of ambition, loyalty, and the price of fame.