In a world where royal news often feels like a never-ending soap opera, the latest chapter features none other than Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s children, Archie and Lilibet.
Dubbed the “ghost kids,” these two have become a focal point of discussion, especially as the couple prepares for yet another trip—this time to Colombia—without their little ones.
It seems like every time Meghan has a public engagement, the kids are mysteriously absent.
So, what’s really going on here?
As Harry and Meghan pack their bags for Colombia, the kids will remain at home once again.
Now, some might say, “Of course they wouldn’t bring the children; Colombia can be dangerous.”
But hold on a second!
Could that be exactly what the Sussexes want us to think?
What if Archie and Lilibet are less than they appear?
Some critics argue that these children might be nothing more than a clever ruse crafted by Meghan to maintain her relevance and exert pressure on the royal family.
Have you ever actually seen these kids in public?
I mean, really seen them, not just blurry images that could be any child?
The truth is, sightings of Archie and Lilibet are as rare as finding a unicorn.
This raises an eyebrow, doesn’t it?
Is it possible that the whole idea of these children is simply smoke and mirrors, designed to keep everyone guessing?
Let’s take a closer look at Archie, the so-called phantom prince.
Born under a shroud of secrecy without the traditional photo op outside the hospital, he has been seen only a handful of times.
Each appearance is shrouded in mystery, often captured from such a distance that it leaves fans speculating.
It’s akin to trying to spot Bigfoot—just when you think you see something, it’s gone before you can confirm it.
Then there’s Lilibet, named after the Queen herself.
Some speculate that this was a strategic move to win favor with the royal family.
Yet, have we ever actually laid eyes on this supposed princess?
Nope!
She’s always claimed to be too young to travel, which seems awfully convenient for the Sussexes, doesn’t it?
Adding fuel to the fire, an ex-royal bodyguard recently expressed concerns about security regarding the Colombia trip.
But let’s pause for a moment: how can children who might not even exist be at risk?
It’s a perplexing situation that raises more questions than answers.
In the entertainment industry, they often say it’s all about illusion, and this seems to be a masterclass in creating one.
This entire charade may not just be about garnering attention—though Meghan certainly loves that.
By fabricating the existence of these “phantom children,” she has cleverly positioned herself to leverage the monarchy.
After all, the royal family can’t deny the existence of kids they’ve never truly seen.
As long as Archie and Lilibet are out there, even in whispers, Meghan maintains a connection to the royal family, allowing her to keep herself in the spotlight.
It’s a brilliant strategy, albeit morally questionable.
Meghan can flaunt her role as a devoted mother when it suits her, while conveniently sidestepping the chaos of actual parenting—no sleepless nights, messy diapers, or school runs.
Instead, she gets to curate a perfect image through staged photo ops that bolster her public relations narrative.
Let’s not overlook the financial implications either.
These ghost kids could open doors to lucrative book deals, TV specials, and exclusive interviews.
Imagine the headlines: “Archie’s First Words” or “Lilibet’s Royal Christening.”
The possibilities are endless, and the beauty of it all?
Meghan doesn’t even need to produce any tangible evidence of their existence—just a well-crafted press release and maybe a few blurry photos.
While Meghan plays this elaborate game, she risks trivializing the struggles of real parents who juggle work and family life.
Many parents face tough decisions about childcare and travel, yet Meghan seems to bask in the sympathy of motherhood without any of the actual sacrifices.
It’s a disheartening reality that many find insulting.
Skeptics may wonder why no one has blown the whistle on this situation if it’s true.
But consider this: who would dare speak up?
The royal family is unlikely to risk their reputation, staff members are bound by strict NDAs, and the media is often too eager to report whatever scraps Meghan chooses to share.
What we have here is a potential con of monumental proportions.
So, the next time you hear about Archie or Lilibet being too sick to travel or too young to make an appearance, remember this: If they don’t exist, they can’t catch a cold, and they certainly can’t be too young to travel.
It’s high time we demand the truth and stop letting Meghan pull the wool over our eyes.
The saga of the ghost kids deserves a definitive end, and perhaps it’s time for all of us to start asking the hard questions.