In a recent turn of events, a photograph of Meghan Markle has sparked intense speculation and debate among the public.

The image, posted on social media early on Thanksgiving morning, shows Meghan standing at the back door of a private jet, cradling what appears to be a baby wrapped in a swaddling cloth.

However, it is the peculiar position of the baby that has captured the attention of many.

Observers have suggested that the baby looks more like a doll than an actual child.

Some have even gone as far as claiming that Meghan was holding a doll named Darren, as the baby in the photo seemed too small to be her one-year-old son, Archie.

This raises questions about Meghan’s understanding of how to hold a baby properly.

Speculation suggests that she may have been misinformed about the correct way to support a newborn’s head and neck, leading her to hold dolls in a similar manner.

This theory is further fueled by past incidents where Meghan was seen holding Archie in a seemingly incorrect manner.

Adding to the controversy, there are rumors circulating that Meghan and Prince Harry’s second child, Lillibet, does not actually exist.

Tweets following the Jubilee claimed that no children were seen with the couple, not even during passport control.

Additionally, there have been reports of Queen Elizabeth II battling bone cancer, making it highly unlikely for her to engage with children.

Further doubts arise from the lack of concrete evidence regarding the existence of Meghan and Harry’s children.

While some individuals claim to have seen their children, no photographs or verifications have been provided.

It is important to note that merely seeing children in their home does not confirm their relationship to the couple.

Moreover, suspicions have been raised about the authenticity of the photos.

It is alleged that the images have been manipulated through Photoshop, with features such as teeth, hair, clothes, and skin tone altered to create the illusion of different children.

Some even suggest that random children have been photographed from behind to maintain anonymity.

Contrary to claims made by Netflix, who reportedly filmed the Sussexes’ family life, many find it hard to believe that these children are genuine.

The constant changes in their appearances, both in terms of hair and facial features, only add to the skepticism.

Critics argue that the children depicted in the photos resemble realistic-looking dolls rather than actual human beings.

In an attempt to further support their narrative, Meghan has been accused of borrowing Hartford Schroeder as a stand-in for Lily when needing to show a quick picture.

However, it is alleged that her request to borrow Hartford was denied, as it was deemed too far and logistically challenging.

These controversies have led to calls for transparency and proof regarding the existence of Meghan and Harry’s children.

Many believe that it is time for someone other than nannies to come forward and provide concrete evidence.

Concerns have also been raised about the well-being of Archie, with claims that the school staff is disturbed by Meghan’s behavior towards him.

Amidst all the speculation, one question remains: why not announce that the Sussexes are now part of Prince Charles’ family but no longer members of the monarchy?

As the debate continues, only time will reveal the truth behind these puzzling circumstances.