In recent times, there have been numerous reports circulating about Doria Raglan’s alleged criminal history.

However, the information available is riddled with contradictions and uncertainties.

While some claim she spent a decade in prison, others suggest it was related to tax evasion, while a few dismiss it all as mere fabrication.

Amidst this confusion, a Redditor has come forward with what they believe to be credible evidence of Doria’s past.

According to this netizen, Doria found herself in court on two occasions due to eviction attempts by landlords.

The first incident took place in 1997, followed by another in 2003.

Shedding light on the matter, Tom, in an interview with Dan Wooten, asserted that Doria was involved in drug dealing and had been absent from her daughter Megan’s life for a staggering 13 years.

Unfortunately, he refrained from providing further details for legal reasons.

Interestingly, Lady C’s biography of Megan also mentions prolonged periods of absence in Doria’s life.

However, the term “drug dealer” encompasses a wide range of possibilities, varying from a major player in the narcotics trade to a local distributor or even someone who engaged in a single transaction involving compensation for substances.

By using carefully crafted language, one can make technically true accusations without crossing into defamation territory.

While Tom’s claims lack concrete evidence of Doria’s involvement in drug dealing, he has earned a reputation for being reliable.

His extensive experience in writing biographies on renowned individuals has garnered him credibility, reinforced by his successful track record in court battles.

The absence of any legal action against him further suggests that his assertions may hold some truth.

Tom went on to discuss Doria’s alleged visits to Humboldt County, where she supposedly spent time at marijuana farms, potentially working as a trimigrant before returning with a substantial quantity of cannabis.

Although the implication is that she intended to sell it, Tom does not explicitly state this.

In the days before legalization, purchasing marijuana was not as simple as walking into a store; one had to rely on trusted sources for bulk purchases.

The New Zealand Herald delved into Doria’s financial struggles, which align with the timelines of the court cases.

In 2002, around the time Megan was embarking on her acting career, Doria filed for bankruptcy, citing heavy credit card debts amounting to approximately $42,000 and claiming no personal property.

During her recovery from bankruptcy, a landlord dispute arose in 2003 when she moved into a two-bedroom apartment with an exchange student as a roommate.

Rumors abound regarding a potential super injunction related to the birth of the baby and Doria’s past, making it legally forbidden to even mention its existence.

It is worth noting that criminal records in the United States are typically filed at the county level.

Therefore, it remains plausible that Doria’s arrest could have occurred in a different county or even another state.

Additionally, it is possible that the county in question lacked an online system at the time, resulting in the absence of older records.

Adding to the intrigue, there is a lack of any employment history or resume during this period for Doria.

Given her need for financial sustenance, engaging in illicit activities such as drug dealing would seemingly provide a logical explanation.

Such transactions operate on a cash basis, leaving no paper trail for income tax filings, which could account for the absence of relevant records.

As for Doria’s previous imprisonment, some believe that her criminal record may have been sealed.