Harry and Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, have reportedly chosen not to stay at their former residence, Frogmore Cottage, amidst rumors of tension within the royal family.
Instead, it is believed that they are currently residing at the exclusive Soho House.
Speculation suggests that Meghan’s fear of losing Harry has led her to desire constant presence by his side, even when he spends time with his brother.
These claims have been made by Neil Sean, a reliable source in the royal news circuit.
While Harry is said to still have a desire to maintain some connection with his family in the United Kingdom, Meghan appears to have reservations about Frogmore Cottage.
It is not the potential ghosts lurking in the historic Windsor estate that concern her, but rather the memories associated with her past life.
According to a trusted insider, Meghan’s time in Windsor has not been filled with happy moments, and it is understandable that she may wish to move on from that chapter.
Despite their reported differences, Neil Sean suggests that Harry is still keen to maintain some level of association with the Royals.
However, Meghan allegedly has no intention of returning to Frogmore Cottage and would prefer to stay in a London hotel.
The question remains: how long will Frogmore remain their home?
Will Harry continue to straddle both worlds, or will he bid farewell to his royal ties forever?
In the midst of these speculations, Meghan Markle’s recent speech in Manchester has faced criticism and mockery from the UK press.
Matthew Steeples, a respected broadcaster and author, has called out the Sussexes for what he perceives as hypocritical and untruthful behavior in their ongoing campaign against the royal family.
While the new Prime Minister, Liz Truss, visits Balmoral to meet with the Queen, it remains unknown if Harry and Meghan, who are currently in Europe, will make a similar visit.
Steeples also noted a decline in public sympathy towards the Sussexes.
He suggests that when individuals make themselves the center of attention, they risk becoming the story themselves, rather than the good works they aim to promote.
This sentiment was echoed on Twitter by Jimmy Faila of Fox across America, who criticized Meghan’s actions in the United Kingdom.
In another development, Richard Eden of the Daily Mail highlighted the charity work of a mother and daughter duo behind the One Young World Charity, which reportedly earned them a significant income during the pandemic.
Matthew Steeples, editor of Steeple Times, expressed surprise that Baroness Meyer, who had previously been called out for her charitable antics, had not commented on the matter.
As the saga surrounding Harry and Meghan continues, the public’s perception of the couple seems to be shifting.
The focus has shifted from their charitable endeavors to the ongoing family rift.
Only time will tell how this narrative unfolds and what lies ahead for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.