In a recent interview, renowned journalist Greg Sheridan expressed his concerns about Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, stating that they have taken the concept of victimhood to an extreme level.
Comparing them to characters from the popular series “The Crown,” Sheridan criticized the couple for constantly complaining about their lives and self-fulfillment, while neglecting their duties to the nation.
He further accused them of tarnishing the reputation of not only their own country but also the entire Western world.
Sheridan highlighted Harry’s speech at the United Nations, where he equated the United States with the Soviet Union in terms of human rights abuses.
He argued that the couple sees racism where it does not exist, despite Meghan Markle having led a privileged life and being warmly welcomed into the royal family.
Additionally, he suggested that Harry’s discontent stems from not being the heir and constantly comparing himself to his older brother.
Meanwhile, Meghan is seen as perpetuating the zeitgeist and exaggerating negative influences in society.
While Sheridan’s critique may seem obvious to some, he acknowledged that the couple still has a significant following in the United States, particularly for their complaints.
However, polls indicate that their reputation in Britain has plummeted.
Sheridan speculated that part of the appeal in the US lies in Americans’ desire to feel morally superior to the British, especially when it comes to issues of race and the royal family.
He attributed this sentiment to a mix of inferiority complexes and contempt towards the British, perpetuated by American sci-fi movies and literature.
Furthermore, Sheridan argued that the support Harry and Meghan receive reflects a broader trend among millennials and individuals under 50, who have never experienced significant hardships.
Despite their immense privilege, they are able to identify as victims and gain sympathy.
This victimhood, according to Sheridan, has become a form of social currency, allowing people to claim mistreatment based on perceived slights to their identity.
In terms of international politics, Sheridan shifted the conversation to Australia’s relationship with China.
He commended six federal politicians from both major political parties for visiting Taiwan, despite threats from China’s state media.
He criticized the notion that Australia should appease China simply because of a momentary display of friendliness.
Sheridan emphasized that Australia has the right to maintain normal relationships with Taiwan and support its international recognition as an independent nation.
China’s attempts to bully and intimidate nations that do not align with its agenda pose a potential danger to Australia, especially during a period of stabilization in relations.
Sheridan highlighted China’s unjust treatment of Australia, including the detention of its citizens on false charges and the imposition of trade sanctions without any valid justification.
In light of these actions, he applauded the Albanese government and politicians like Barnaby Joyce and Tony Abbott for standing up to China’s bullying tactics and expressing solidarity with Taiwan.
In conclusion, Greg Sheridan’s remarks shed light on the controversies surrounding Harry and Meghan, emphasizing their obsession with victimhood and the impact it has on their reputation and public opinion.
Additionally, he underscored the importance of Australia’s stance against China’s bullying tactics and the need to support Taiwan’s independence.