In a recent turn of events, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have found themselves at the center of yet another controversy.

This time, it revolves around the naming of their daughter, Lilibet.

While some may argue that they did not need Queen Elizabeth’s permission to choose the name, others believe that their decision was disrespectful towards the late monarch.

One person who has come to their defense is Dr. Shola Moss Shugbamamu, a political activist and lawyer.

However, her support has sparked further debate on the matter.

Dr. Shola took to Twitter to defend the couple, stating that they did not require anyone’s permission, including the Queen’s, to name their child Lilibet.

She argued that the choice was made out of respect, not necessity.

However, critics quickly pointed out flaws in her argument.

Firstly, they highlighted that the name Lilibet predates Queen Elizabeth and was not exclusively associated with her.

Secondly, they questioned whether any grandmother would be angry at having a great-grandchild named after her.

These claims were seen by many as an attempt to tarnish the late Queen’s character and judgment.

The controversy surrounding the name choice has also provided ammunition for tabloids like the Daily Mail to further defame Harry and Meghan.

By dredging up the memory of the late Queen, they have capitalized on the situation to profit from sensationalized news.

However, it is important to note that this story primarily damages the couple’s reputation rather than tarnishing the memory of Queen Elizabeth.

Critics argue that Harry and Meghan should have sought the Queen’s permission before using the name Lilibet.

Given the importance of names in the British royal family, it is seen as a sign of disrespect that they did not consult her beforehand.

Moreover, after Prince Philip’s passing, the late Queen explicitly requested that the name not be used again.

Even if Harry and Meghan assumed this only applied to her, they should have known better and sought clarification.

Their failure to do so suggests a lack of consideration for the Queen’s feelings.

Furthermore, claims that the name Lilibet predates Queen Elizabeth are met with skepticism.

Lilibet was a childhood nickname that the Queen gave herself when she couldn’t pronounce her own name.

It was an intimate family name, not a common one picked out of a baby names book.

Dr. Shola’s argument that the Queen should have been honored by their choice does not hold up, as they did not choose the name Elizabeth but rather a private family pet name.

In response to Dr. Shola’s defense, royal fans have expressed their disagreement on Twitter.

Some argue that Harry and Meghan have done more good in a few short years than any of their ancestors.

However, such claims are seen as absurd by those who question their contributions and achievements.

Another user pointed out that the Queen was not angry at the name itself but rather the lie that she had given her blessing, which she had not.

It is clear that the naming controversy has divided opinions.

While some defend Harry and Meghan’s right to choose their daughter’s name, others believe that their actions were disrespectful towards the late Queen.

The debate continues to rage on social media platforms, with users sharing their thoughts and engaging in spirited discussions.

As for Prince Harry’s alleged regret over the Megxit fallout, viewers of a recent video expressed skepticism.

Many believe that Harry is more concerned with self-preservation and avoiding the consequences of his actions.

Some even suggest that his drug use may hinder his ability to feel genuine remorse.

While opinions differ, it is evident that the controversy surrounding Harry and Meghan shows no signs of abating.

In conclusion, the naming of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s daughter, Lilibet, has stirred up a heated debate.

Supporters argue that the couple did not need Queen Elizabeth’s permission, while critics claim their actions were disrespectful.

Dr. Shola Moss Shugbamamu’s defense of the couple has further fueled the controversy.

As discussions continue, it remains to be seen how this latest chapter in the ongoing saga of Harry and Meghan will unfold.