In a recent turn of events, it has been disclosed that the deal between QVC and Megan Markle took a nosedive following her calamitous attempt at selling counterfeit diamonds.

The revelation, brought to light by WME staff, sheds light on the failed collaboration that left many in disbelief.

Lady C, a prominent figure, affirmed suspicions that had been circulating for months.

It appears that Harkal harbored aspirations of becoming a QVC presenter, peddling jewelry – albeit of the faux diamond variety.

QVC, an American shopping channel under the Courette Retail Group umbrella, is renowned for its televised home shopping programs.

Drawing parallels to Sarah Ferguson’s stint selling juices and diet plans on QVC, Megan seemed keen on emulating her success.

Lady C hinted at potential setbacks for Harkal, stating, “I heard one or two of the people are already turning him down.”

Moreover, rumors suggest Megan’s pursuit of a collaboration with a renowned jewelry designer, bearing similarities to a 1950s screen icon.

Reports indicate Megan’s interest in retailing lab-grown diamonds, distinct from traditional mined gems.

Noteworthy is the conspicuous pinky ring she sported at a recent film premiere, sparking intrigue among observers.

Despite her fashion missteps, Megan’s endeavor to venture into jewelry sales underscores her ambitious nature.

Contrasting the glamour of QVC in the ’90s with its current landscape, the prospect of Megan assuming a presenter role seemed far-fetched.

While celebrities endorsing products on QVC is commonplace, Megan’s aspirations faced a setback with her failed casting attempt.

Royal commentator Quentin Letts criticized Megan’s approach to media, labeling it as manipulative and opportunistic.

Letts’ scathing critique delves into Megan’s alleged disconnect from British sensibilities, portraying her as out of touch with societal norms.

He lambasts her perceived self-portrayal as a vulnerable soul, contrasting it with a calculated career trajectory.

The Sussexes’ penchant for dramatic press releases, viewed through a British lens, appears contrived and insincere.

As opinions align with Letts’ candid assessment, doubts linger over the authenticity of the Sussexes’ public image.

Their attempts at crafting poignant narratives may resonate differently with British audiences, evoking skepticism rather than admiration.

The intricacies of celebrity endorsements and media strategies continue to shape public perception, prompting introspection on the dynamics of fame and influence.