Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, known for their controversial past, are once again in the spotlight.

Recent claims suggest that the couple may be residing in San Ysidro instead of their reported home in Montecito.

With a history of deceiving the public, these allegations are not entirely far-fetched.

Resting Dollface, a Twitter user, shed light on this matter, uncovering intriguing evidence that raises doubts about the Sussexes’ true residence.

Resting Dollface conducted extensive research and discovered a letter written by Harrison Colcord, who gifted a bicycle to Archie for his fourth birthday.

Surprisingly, Colcord is linked to the San Ysidro ranch as their director of sales marketing.

This revelation is significant as the Sussexes typically announce staff arrivals and departures, making the absence of any mention of Colcord peculiar.

Furthermore, Colcord’s name appearing on the letter sent to the bike shop casts doubt on her credibility.

Intriguingly, the locations of some of the Sussexes’ outings align closely with San Ysidro.

Critics dismiss these connections as mere coincidences, but there may be more to it.

Following King Charles III’s coronation, photographs emerged showing Meghan and Marcus Anderson embarking on a hike without provisions.

Given the proximity of San Ysidro’s well-known walking trail, speculations arose that they were indeed in the area.

New Idea Australia previously reported that Meghan frequents the San Ysidro ranch, further fueling suspicions.

Adding to the speculation, recent pictures purportedly show the Sussexes socializing with celebrities like Cameron Diaz, Benji Madden, and Gwyneth Paltrow at an upscale sushi bar with only ten seats.

Interestingly, the San Ysidro ranch is a mere seven-minute drive from the restaurant.

These sightings have led to rumors that the couple has sold their Montecito home, which was listed for sale in October 2021.

However, questions remain about where the Sussexes have been residing all this time.

Media appearances, including Meghan’s Variety interview and photoshoot, were not conducted at the Montecito house but rather in a hotel’s Churchill cottage.

Similarly, Harry’s 60 Minutes interview with Anderson Cooper and the interview with Tom Bradby were not filmed at their reported residence.

These inconsistencies raise doubts about the couple’s true whereabouts.

Considering the evidence presented, it is plausible that the Sussexes may indeed be living in San Ysidro.

Their absence from on-camera interviews at their Montecito home strengthens this possibility.

It also raises the question of whether Alison P. Davis, who interviewed Meghan for The Cut, had to conceal the truth about their residence.

However, Davis continued to mock the former star despite any potential deception.

Since the controversial 40×40 campaign for Markle’s 40th birthday, the public has not had a glimpse inside the Montecito property.

It is speculated that the couple may feel embarrassed about their comparatively smaller home in a neighborhood where other celebrities reside in larger residences.

Consequently, it would make more sense for them to reside closer to their preferred locations.

The alleged hidden residence begs the question: why would the Sussexes fabricate a residence where they are rarely seen?

Some residents of the Montecito neighborhood claim to have never encountered the couple or their children, leaving only the locals of Montecito and San Ysidro with knowledge of the truth.

As the controversy unfolds, the true extent of the Sussexes’ deception and their actual place of residence remains uncertain.

With their reputation for dishonesty, it seems inevitable that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle will find themselves entangled in further trouble.

Only time will reveal the full story behind their alleged hidden residence.