In a shocking turn of events, Meghan Markle and Omid Scobie have been exposed for leaking confidential information regarding the Queen’s demise.
However, new revelations from Benjamin Smallbrook and Cora shed light on a different angle to the story.
According to Smallbrook, Scobie released a press statement on the day of the Queen’s passing, revealing that her body would be transported from Scotland to Buckingham Palace via train.
This exclusive information was disclosed during Scobie’s appearance on ABC News on September 8th, where he detailed the arrangements following the Queen’s death at Balmoral Castle.
It seems that Scobie was the first to break the news, earning him accolades for his swift reporting.
However, recent developments suggest that Christine Will Shermer, who claims to be Markle’s trusted media confidante, may have put her foot down.
Speculation arises as to whether Shermer has instructed Scobie not to release any press statements without her prior approval.
The question remains: did Markle herself give this directive?
The compatibility among the trio seems doubtful, and many believe Scobie will be the first to face the consequences.
Observers anticipate a potential fallout between Scobie and his former employer, as he possesses a wealth of inside knowledge that could be used against them.
Shermer was reportedly horrified upon learning about the successful sting operation.
During their stay at Balmoral, Prince William and Prince Charles deliberately misled Prince Harry by informing him that the Queen’s coffin would be transported by train from Scotland, despite prior arrangements for her to be flown to RAF Northwalt before reaching Buckingham Palace.
The intention was to test if this information would be leaked.
Unfortunately, Harry shared this detail with Markle, and within hours, Scobie had access to the exclusive news.
In response to Benjamin Smallbrook’s post, one commentator highlighted another falsehood perpetuated by Scobie.
Not only did he fabricate the train story, but he also falsely claimed that the Queen’s body would rest in the smallest castle in Edinburgh.
While there are indeed small castles in the area, Holyrood Palace is not one of them.
The deliberate use of misinformation surrounding the train and the castle aimed to discredit Scobie and his handler, ultimately achieving its desired effect.
Another commenter expressed relief at not informing Prince Harry about the Queen’s passing until the last possible moment.
Their rationale was to prevent Meghan from prematurely releasing the news, which would have reached the American public before an official statement from the Royal Family.
In his inaugural address as King, Charles III expressed his affection for Harry and Meghan as they continue to build their lives overseas.
This gesture suggests a potential easing of tensions between the Sussexes and the Royal Family.
According to CTV News Royal commentator Richard Berthelsen, resolving the hostility between Prince Harry, Meghan Markle, and the Royal Family will be crucial for the monarchy’s future.
Berthelsen emphasizes that the ongoing transatlantic rift generates interest, sells books and magazines, but comes at a cost for the Royal Family, who cannot constantly respond to such matters.
Berthelsen further argues that family conflicts divert attention from the important work the Royal Family should be focusing on.
He emphasizes that they should not be treated as a soap opera, but rather as advocates for various causes, representatives of the kingdom, and ambassadors during their visits.
While the monarchy consists of eleven working members, Berthelsen points out that the core lies within these four individuals.
A recent photo shared of the foursome, taken at Buckingham Palace on September 18th, solidifies this notion.
By featuring the new king alongside the Queen Consort and the Prince and Princess of Wales, the image signifies the future of the monarchy.