Amidst growing speculation surrounding the potential divorce of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, many are curious about the fate of their children, Archie and Lilibet.
With Prince Harry possibly returning to the UK to be with the royal family, the question arises: who will have custody of the Sussex kids?
This complex situation becomes even more challenging considering Archie’s position in the line of succession.
While some may assume that King Charles would want both Archie and Lilibet back in the UK, given their royal lineage, it is unlikely to be a straightforward decision.
Stripping Archie and Lilibet away from their mother would undoubtedly be perceived as harsh and cruel.
Additionally, Meghan’s current unpopularity in the UK makes it improbable for her to willingly relocate there.
Alternatively, Meghan may choose to keep her children in California, raising them as far away as possible from the royal family, even if it means separating them from their father.
Another possibility could be joint custody, allowing Meghan and Prince Harry to share parenting responsibilities and ensuring the children spend equal time with both parents.
This arrangement would require the children to split their time between California and the UK, involving frequent transatlantic travel.
However, doubts have been raised by some royal fans who question the existence of Archie and Lilibet.
These skeptics believe that Harry and Meghan used other people’s children for photographs and videos, dubbing them “Archificial” and “Invisible Lily.”
If these speculations were to be confirmed as true, it raises the question of how the palace would address the revelation.
How would they explain the absence of children who were previously presented as part of the line of succession on the couple’s official website?
Adding to the uncertainty, there is a lack of concrete evidence regarding the births of Archie and Lilibet.
No doctors’ signatures appear on their birth certificates, unlike other royal births that have been verified by the attending physicians.
Furthermore, no records can be found in hospitals around Windsor and Montecito for the dates when Archie and Lilibet were supposedly born.
This absence of documentation raises eyebrows and prompts further questions about the children’s origins.
The absence of public appearances by Lilibet has also raised suspicions.
The obstetrician who claimed to have delivered her abruptly closed down their practice when inquiries were made.
The sudden closure only adds to the intrigue and fuels speculation about the legitimacy of Lilibet’s birth.
Considering these doubts, it may not be unreasonable for King Charles to request proof of birth for Meghan and Harry’s children.
Rumors suggest that he is considering unsealing Archie’s birth record, which could potentially reveal whether he was born via surrogacy.
The timing of filing birth records is also worth noting, as they must typically be completed within a specific timeframe.
In the end, the future of Archie and Lilibet remains uncertain, as does the truth behind their existence.
As the public awaits further developments, it remains to be seen how this intricate situation will unfold and what implications it may have for the royal family.