In a puzzling turn of events, questions have arisen surrounding the existence of Meghan and Harry’s children.
Despite their claims of not having any children, it appears that something is amiss.
During Archie’s christening, King Charles refrained from holding the infant, opting to stand nearby without making physical contact.
Curiously, there are no photos of anyone other than Meghan with these seemingly photoshopped kids.
Even Charles has never laid eyes on the alleged Lily, except for the PR team responsible for providing images for the Netflix deal.
However, Netflix personnel themselves have never seen or photographed the children.
Adding to the intrigue, Meghan’s daughter Lilibet has been observed to have a peculiar second toe, unusually long and seemingly out of proportion.
Furthermore, there are suspicions of photo manipulation, as her feet appear to have been altered.
These anomalies raise doubts about the authenticity of the images presented to the public.
Meghan’s claim that Archie has begun asking about his grandfather has also come under scrutiny.
Experts argue that it is highly unlikely for a four-year-old child to inquire about adults they have no recollection of meeting, even if they are relatives.
The cognitive development of a child at this age does not typically focus on abstract adults.
This raises concerns about the authenticity of Meghan’s narrative, as using a child to gain sympathy is deemed distasteful.
Moreover, a Quora user named Diana Eppers has highlighted additional mysteries surrounding Harry and Meghan’s children.
It is unclear who delivered Archie, as no doctors’ signatures are present on the birth certificate displayed at Buckingham Palace.
Similarly, Lilibet’s birth lacks verification from the delivering doctor, unlike previous royal births.
This deviation from tradition has led to speculation that Meghan deliberately avoided using the Queen’s trusted doctors, insinuating ulterior motives.
Diana Eppers further points out the absence of hospital records during the supposed birth dates of Archie and Lilibet in Windsor and Montecito.
This raises questions about where and to whom these children were born.
The fact that Meghan declined to introduce Archie on the steps of the Lindo Wing, a customary practice among royal mothers, fuels speculation that she may not have given birth to him.
Compounding the mystery, there are no public sightings of Lilibet in the UK, and the OB doctor who claimed to have delivered her abruptly closed her practice when inquiries were made.
These circumstances only deepen the enigma surrounding Meghan and Harry’s children.
Curiously, there is a conspicuous absence of any photographs featuring Meghan, Harry, Archie, and Lilibet together.
Given Meghan’s affinity for fame and the paparazzi, it is perplexing why she has not released any unaltered images of her children.
Instead, she has been known to use other children, including those of Frin, as stand-ins for Archie and Lilibet.
Grainy black and white videos and painted pictures have also been employed, further fueling doubts about the authenticity of these portrayals.
With the lack of concrete evidence and numerous inconsistencies, the public is left questioning the true story behind Meghan and Harry’s children.
The absence of transparency and the use of altered imagery only serve to deepen the mystery.
As speculations continue to swirl, the truth behind the existence and identity of Meghan and Harry’s children remains shrouded in uncertainty.