In recent years, doubts have been cast over the circumstances surrounding the birth of Archie Mountbatten-Windsor, the son of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry.

Numerous inconsistencies and peculiar details have emerged, leaving many to wonder where exactly Archie was born and if the story presented to the public is accurate.

Initially, it was believed that Meghan had a home birth.

However, the birth certificate indicates that Archie was born at Portland Hospital in London, contradicting this earlier claim.

Adding to the confusion, the couple left the hospital merely an hour after the birth, which raises eyebrows considering the typical recovery time for new mothers.

One of the most significant red flags is the conflicting accounts regarding the doctors involved in the deliveries.

An obstetrician in London, who allegedly delivered Archie, has denied being present, stating that she was out of town on the day in question.

Furthermore, the doctor who supposedly delivered Lily, Archie’s sister, abruptly closed their practice, creating further skepticism.

Meghan’s description of her delivery process has also come under scrutiny.

She claimed to have had an epidural and then delivered Archie in a bathtub, but experts have refuted this assertion.

Medical professionals have explained that it is unsafe to administer an epidural to a woman laboring in water.

These inaccuracies suggest that Meghan may not fully comprehend the birthing process.

Furthermore, Meghan stated that Archie was wrapped in a towel and handed to her immediately after birth.

However, experts clarify that in water births, the baby is lifted out of the water and placed directly into the mother’s arms within seconds, with the umbilical cord still attached.

This discrepancy highlights a lack of understanding on Meghan’s part or a deliberate attempt to mislead.

The lack of basic research by the couple is glaringly evident.

It is common knowledge that after giving birth, it is not advisable to leave the hospital within an hour or two.

The physical toll and necessary postnatal checks make such a hasty departure highly improbable, especially for a first-time mother and someone of Meghan’s age.

These discrepancies and inconsistencies raise doubts about the authenticity of Archie’s birth.

Speculation has grown, suggesting that Meghan did not give birth to Archie, and his reported birthdate of May 6th may be inaccurate.

The claims made by the couple regarding the circumstances surrounding Archie’s birth are so outlandish that they warrant an investigation or at least a response from the hospital to address the damaging lies.

The notion of a geriatric water birth following an epidural, followed by an immediate departure from the hospital, is not only embarrassing but also medically implausible.

Recovering from childbirth takes time, and there are specific protocols in place to ensure the well-being of both mother and baby before discharge.

Moreover, some observers have even questioned the authenticity of the baby itself, suggesting that the child being held by the couple appears more like a doll than a real newborn.

Observations such as the absence of visible blood vessels on the face and limited movement have fueled these speculations.

The mystery surrounding Archie Mountbatten-Windsor’s birth continues to perplex many.

The conflicting accounts, questionable details, and lack of substantial evidence have raised significant doubts about the veracity of Meghan and Harry’s narrative.

As the public seeks answers, it remains unclear what truly transpired during Archie’s birth and why the couple’s story seems to deviate from what is commonly understood about the birthing process.