The recent passing of the Queen has brought attention to the new titles bestowed upon the Sussex children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet.

However, it is interesting to note that American news outlets did not use any of the photos released by the Sussex’s PR machine.

Instead, an outdated picture of Archie was used, and no picture of Lilibet was included.

This discrepancy caught the attention of a royal fan who pointed out the possibility of a conspiracy surrounding Lilibet’s birthday picture.

Initially dismissing the idea as ridiculous, the fan began to question its plausibility after seeing pictures of Stassie Schroeder’s daughter, noting the striking resemblance between the two babies.

Comparing their nose shapes, the fan couldn’t deny the similarities and wondered if the birthday picture truly depicted Lilibet.

Amidst the confusion surrounding the children’s titles, many are unsure whether Archie and Lilibet automatically become Prince and Princess now that Charles is King.

According to the 1917 letters pattern, some outlets assume that Harry’s children would become HRHs as Harry is the son of the monarch.

However, legal documents are open to interpretation, and the royal family has skilled lawyers who can navigate such matters.

The question arises: will Charles allow us to patent this issue?

Meghan claims that this dispute occurred before the Sussex’s decision to step back from their royal duties.

It is difficult to believe that Charles would want Harry’s children to be HRHs now that they have left the firm and are raising their children in America, especially if he didn’t support the idea when they were working royals.

This sheds light on Harry’s animosity towards his father, as well as Meghan’s own grievances.

Meghan previously revealed that conversations about changing Archie’s title took place while she was pregnant.

In an interview with Oprah, Meghan mentioned that the concerns were raised alongside the news that Archie would not receive security as he was not a prince.

While she expressed that the grandeur surrounding titles was not important to her, she highlighted the months of uncertainty during her pregnancy, where discussions revolved around Archie’s lack of security, title, and even concerns about the color of his skin at birth.

The audacity of Meghan’s statements left royal fans astounded.

One online user shared their own experience, stating that their mixed-race children, who have fair skin and blue eyes like Archie, were denied titles based on their race.

They found it ironic to believe that Archie would face racism when their own children, with similar physical attributes, did not.

Amidst these controversies, royal commentator Victoria Howard argues that King Charles, having observed the Queen for decades, will make an exceptional monarch.

Miss Howard believes that Charles’ extensive training and years of watching his mother’s approach to ruling have prepared him to be the best monarch Britain has ever had.

She emphasizes his ability to learn from her and approach matters in a similar manner.

Channel 4’s Matt Frey adds to the discussion, noting that Charles will have his own unique tone and style compared to his mother.

Miss Howard agrees, acknowledging that Charles holds strong opinions but expects him to dial them back as he assumes the role of an apolitical monarch, as expected within the constitution.

As the speculation continues regarding the Sussex children’s titles and Meghan’s earlier remarks resurfacing, the future of the royal family remains uncertain.

Only time will reveal the true extent of the changes and challenges that lie ahead for Prince Archie, Princess Lilibet, and the British monarchy as a whole.