In an industry steeped in deception, few anticipated that Tyler Perry, the Hollywood heavyweight and longtime ally of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, would unveil one of the Sussexes’ best-kept secrets.

During a revealing chat on “The Breakfast Club” last week, Perry dropped a bombshell that rippled through both royal and celebrity circles.

When quizzed about his supposed role as godfather to Lilibet Diana, Perry hesitated before making a statement that sent shockwaves through the carefully constructed narrative surrounding the couple’s post-royal existence.

For over a year, Meghan and Harry maintained that their daughter, Lilibet Diana—named after the Queen’s childhood nickname and Harry’s late mother—was christened in a private ceremony at their Montecito residence in March 2023.

They claimed that Tyler Perry and Oprah Winfrey were among the attendees.

However, Perry’s unexpected admission has reignited doubts about the authenticity of this event.

Was the christening genuine, or merely another piece of PR spin?

Critics have long accused Meghan Markle of using her privacy as a shield to manipulate public perception.

From the couple’s explosive interview with Oprah to their Netflix docuseries, the Sussexes have positioned themselves as truth-tellers in a battle against a controlling institution.

Yet the mystery surrounding Lilibet’s christening raises troubling questions.

In an era where even the most private royal moments are selectively shared, why has no tangible evidence of the event emerged?

Traditionally, royal christenings are public spectacles, complete with official photographs released by Buckingham Palace.

Just look at Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis, whose christenings were celebrated with images shared globally.

Even Archie Mountbatten Windsor’s 2019 christening, though private, included a photo release featuring Meghan, Harry, and Queen Elizabeth II.

In stark contrast, Lilibet’s christening has been shrouded in silence, leaving many to wonder if it ever occurred.

Royal biographer Angela Levin expressed her concerns, stating, “This isn’t merely about privacy; it’s about credibility.”

If the Sussexes fabricated details surrounding the christening, what else might they have misrepresented?

Meghan’s history of bending the truth to fit her narrative adds fuel to the fire.

Levin points to inconsistencies in Meghan’s past statements, such as claiming ignorance about the royal family before dating Harry, despite friends recalling her fascination with Princess Diana.

Perry’s involvement in this saga is particularly striking.

The filmmaker, who graciously offered his Beverly Hills mansion to the couple during their exit from the UK, was thought to be Lilibet’s godfather.

Yet his recent comments suggest he feels blindsided by the narrative surrounding the christening.

“I’m close to them, sure.

But a christening?

That’s a sacred thing,” Perry remarked, visibly uncomfortable.

“If I’m the godfather, wouldn’t I know?”

Sources close to Perry indicate his frustration at being ensnared in the Sussexes’ tangled PR web.

He extended his kindness to help them, yet now realizes they may use anyone to maintain their relevance.

Meanwhile, Oprah Winfrey, another rumored guest, has remained conspicuously silent, brushing off inquiries with a curt “no comment” at a recent premiere.

Skeptics have taken to social media, where the hashtag #LilibetHoax trended for days as users dissected past interviews for hints.

One user pointed out the irony in Harry’s claim that they left the UK to protect their children’s privacy while simultaneously monetizing every detail of their lives.

Others ridiculed Meghan’s 2020 assertion that they were stepping back from royal duties to seek a more peaceful existence, suggesting their actions paint a different picture entirely.

Even those who once supported the couple are starting to waver.

A Reddit user lamented, “I wanted to believe them, but this is getting ridiculous.

If the christening was real, why not just release one photo?”

Buckingham Palace’s unusual silence on Perry’s claims adds another layer of intrigue.

Historically quick to confirm royal births and events, palace aides are now choosing to dodge questions, focusing instead on official duties rather than the private matters of former royals.

Insiders suggest this silence is a strategic move; the palace seems weary of cleaning up after Meghan’s alleged missteps.

As the controversy unfolds, speculation about the Sussexes’ marriage has also intensified.

Once viewed as a modern fairytale, their relationship is now scrutinized as a potentially transactional alliance.

PR expert Mark Borkowski notes, “Harry gave Meghan status, and Meghan gave Harry a cause.

But what happens when that cause becomes perpetual victimhood?”

As the debate rages on, one fact remains clear: Meghan Markle’s credibility is hanging by a thread.

For someone who once vowed to share her story authentically, the absence of proof surrounding such a significant event as Lilibet’s christening is damaging.

Whether the christening was a quiet family affair or an elaborate fabrication, the burden of proof now rests squarely on Meghan and Harry’s shoulders.

Until they provide clarity, the world will continue to question, “If Lilibet’s christening was real, where’s the evidence?”

and “If it wasn’t, what else have the Sussexes concocted to stay relevant?”

In the court of public opinion, Meghan Markle is no longer the plucky heroine defying the establishment; she’s become the lead character in a drama of her own creation.

And as audiences begin to peel back the layers, they’re starting to see through the facade.