Queen Elizabeth II made a surprising visit to MI5 in 2020, causing quite a stir among royal enthusiasts.<\/p>\n

It is uncommon for the Queen to personally visit MI5 or MI6, leading to widespread speculation about the purpose of her visit.<\/p>\n

A royal insider, who wished to remain anonymous, leaked information suggesting that the visit was related to a theft involving Meghan Markle.<\/p>\n

The Queen had been briefed on Meghan’s past behavior, which allegedly included crimes and underhanded actions against Kate Middleton.<\/p>\n

There have been previous incidents where Meghan was accused of stealing items, and it is believed that she should be held accountable for her actions.<\/p>\n

Rumors suggest that another diamond bracelet, previously seen on Kate at a wedding, has mysteriously disappeared.<\/p>\n

This bracelet was a wedding gift from the royal family to Catherine, and her anger towards Meghan has led her to consider legal action.<\/p>\n

In another incident, tensions within the palace escalated when Marco, a close associate of Meghan, was seen wearing a watch similar to the one owned by Princess Diana.<\/p>\n

Prince William, still harboring resentment towards his brother and sister-in-law for their departure from the royal family, was reportedly furious upon learning about this.<\/p>\n

He often wonders what Diana would think of their actions, and the possibility that Harry might have given Meghan one of their mother’s watches only fueled his anger.<\/p>\n

However, it is important to note that there is no concrete evidence regarding Prince William’s alleged feelings towards Marco’s possession of Princess Diana’s watch.<\/p>\n

The claims made by the tabloid may not be accurate, and further information is needed to confirm the veracity of these allegations.<\/p>\n

Princess Catherine, on the other hand, has taken a strong stance against Meghan’s actions.<\/p>\n

She believes that Diana would be deeply upset by the jewels that Meghan allegedly stole and potentially sold.<\/p>\n

Catherine feels that these jewels should rightfully belong to the royal family, particularly to her daughter Charlotte.<\/p>\n

In her opinion, the Wales family should not have any claim to Diana’s jewelry, and it is only fitting that Catherine and Charlotte be allowed to wear them.<\/p>\n

The passing of Queen Elizabeth II on September 8, 2022, has raised questions about the inheritance of her valuable jewelry collection.<\/p>\n

According to reports from Radar Online, Kate has inherited a collection of 300 pieces worth approximately $110 million.<\/p>\n

The true value of these jewels cannot be accurately estimated, as detailed records of their types, such as bracelets, headgear, necklaces, earrings, and specific gemstones, were meticulously maintained by the late Queen.<\/p>\n

It is known that the Queen was meticulous in recording the history of use and condition of the jewelry, as well as keeping track of any borrowed items that were not returned.<\/p>\n

With the Queen’s passing, Princess Catherine has assumed the responsibility of managing these records and ensuring the proper care of the jewelry.<\/p>\n

While some speculate that Queen Elizabeth may have made changes to her will, it is widely believed that Kate received a significant portion of the inheritance and now has full access to the collection.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, it is believed that Meghan Markle’s failure to return borrowed jewelry played a role in the Queen’s reluctance to lend her any additional pieces.<\/p>\n

The tiara Meghan wore at a wedding was actually a replica, as the original had gone missing.<\/p>\n

Some even suggest that Meghan unknowingly wore the imitation tiara on her own wedding day, as she had a history of misplacing items.<\/p>\n

These incidents have undoubtedly influenced the palace’s perception of Meghan.<\/p>\n

Despite the damage caused by Meghan’s actions over the past year, a source close to the royal family reveals that much of the harm had already been done.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Queen Elizabeth II made a surprising visit to MI5 in 2020, causing quite a stir among royal enthusiasts. It is uncommon for the Queen to personally visit MI5 or MI6, leading to…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10366,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10367","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-royal-family"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10367","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10367"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10367\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10368,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10367\/revisions\/10368"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10366"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10367"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10367"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10367"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}