In a surprising turn of events, reports have emerged suggesting that King Charles has chosen not to disown Prince Harry despite the ongoing race controversy that has rocked the royal family.<\/p>\n

The King, it appears, is determined to mend their fractured relationship rather than succumb to the pressure of severing ties.<\/p>\n

A close confidant with an extensive knowledge of the royal family, spanning six decades, shared this revelation with the Sunday Express.<\/p>\n

According to the source, King Charles, as both a parent and a grandparent, remains committed to supporting Harry, Meghan, and their two young children.<\/p>\n

Even in the face of deep hurt caused by the scandalous claims in Nomad Scobie’s book, “Endgame,” the King has chosen the path of parenting over punishment in an effort to rebuild bridges.<\/p>\n

The insider revealed, “It’s a tricky time for Charles, but his overriding decision is that he will not completely cut off the Sussexes.”<\/p>\n

While the allegations in the book are troubling for the palace’s image, Charles is determined not to sever all communication with Harry.<\/p>\n

They may have limited contact, but a lifeline remains.<\/p>\n

Despite the increasing animosity, following the naming of two senior royals in the withdrawn Dutch edition of Scobie’s book, King Charles remains steadfast in his commitment to maintaining some form of contact with his son and his family.<\/p>\n

The royal family is preparing to present a united front in the wake of the controversy, with the King appearing alongside Prince William and Kate for a diplomatic ceremony at Buckingham Palace.<\/p>\n

The Express suggests that Buckingham Palace is considering all options, including the possibility of legal action against the withdrawn Dutch edition of the book.<\/p>\n

However, it refrains from naming the two senior royals implicated due to a lack of proof.<\/p>\n

A royal insider disclosed that the King’s heart is breaking over the separation and animosity with his beloved son.<\/p>\n

The book, which reveals apparent racism and unconscious bias, reopens wounds that originated from Meghan and Harry’s claims during the Oprah Winfrey interview in 2021.<\/p>\n

While the book points to a letter from Meghan to Charles naming the two royals expressing concerns about Archie’s skin color, Scobie has not clarified how he obtained such specific details.<\/p>\n

Currently, the King is consulting with senior advisors to determine the next steps.<\/p>\n

The insider expressed that Charles is taking a level-headed approach, wary of overreacting and escalating matters.<\/p>\n

While Charles’s interactions with Harry and his family remain limited, there is a significant amount of shock and distrust among staff and aides.<\/p>\n

Royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliam speculates that the relationship between Charles and Harry may have fractured beyond repair, describing it as the “endgame.”<\/p>\n

The source added that Charles is adopting the approach of moving forward and ignoring the noise.<\/p>\n

However, it is evident that his heart is breaking, as this incident marks yet another drama between Harry and himself without any face-to-face resolution.<\/p>\n

In light of this disgraceful revelation, it remains to be seen whether King Charles’ decision will bring about a resolution or mark the beginning of the end for the father-son relationship.<\/p>\n

What are your thoughts on this news?<\/p>\n

Share your opinions in the comments below.<\/p>\n

Stay tuned for more shocking stories and scandalous expos\u00e9s on our YouTube channel.<\/p>\n

Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to stay updated on the latest from the world of the Royal Family.<\/p>\n

Thank you for watching, and we’ll be back soon with more fascinating news about the Royal Family.<\/p>\n

Goodbye for now.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In a surprising turn of events, reports have emerged suggesting that King Charles has chosen not to disown Prince Harry despite the ongoing race controversy that has rocked the royal family. The…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":16225,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16226","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-royal-family"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16226","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16226"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16226\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16227,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16226\/revisions\/16227"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16225"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16226"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16226"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16226"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}