In a shocking revelation, Omid Scobie’s latest book, “Endgame,” has ignited a storm of controversy surrounding Meghan Markle’s motherhood.<\/p>\n
Scobie alleges that Meghan sent pictures of her children to the Sultan, fueling rumors of a connection between her and King Charles.<\/p>\n
These explicit claims have given rise to conspiracy theories suggesting that Meghan used surrogates and that Prince Harry’s children may not be biologically hers.<\/p>\n
According to sources, surrogates have come forward, claiming to have given birth to Meghan’s children.<\/p>\n
Allegedly, Archie was even placed in a room reserved for the hospital, and nurses have corroborated similar accounts regarding Lilibet.<\/p>\n
These claims have led some to question Meghan’s maternal instincts, suggesting that she lacks the ability to connect with her own children and other kids in general.<\/p>\n
It appears that Meghan is more focused on maintaining her reputation as a former royal embroiled in scandals.<\/p>\n
The controversy surrounding Meghan’s maternity has reached extreme levels, with some calling for DNA tests to confirm the existence of her children.<\/p>\n
These claims initially surfaced during an interview with Paris Match, where Scobie discussed his book, “The Endgame,” and the ongoing battle between the royals and the monarchy.<\/p>\n
However, it is important to note that Meghan did not directly email these images to King Charles, contrary to Scobie’s claims.<\/p>\n
She has expressed her desire for her children to have a close relationship with their grandfather.<\/p>\n
While Meghan seems open to rebuilding relationships within the royal family, the same cannot be said for Harry.<\/p>\n
In an interview with People Magazine, Scobie confirmed that Harry still harbors unresolved issues with his family following their separation from the royal fold.<\/p>\n
The couple’s shocking revelations in their Netflix documentary, “Harry and Meghan,” further fueled rumors of their strained relationship with the royals.<\/p>\n
It has been reported that Meghan and Harry are not invited to spend Christmas in England, despite their previous family Christmas at Sandringham in 2018.<\/p>\n
Netizens have taken to social media to express their opinions on Scobie’s claims, with some criticizing the author and others delving into the conspiracy theories surrounding Meghan’s alleged fake pregnancy.<\/p>\n
One Twitter user pointed out an error in Scobie’s statement, highlighting that King Charles does indeed have a cell phone.<\/p>\n
The public is now demanding transparency regarding the legalities of surrogate children and their inheritance rights.<\/p>\n
As the debate rages on, many have questioned the physical aspects of Meghan’s pregnancies.<\/p>\n
Some argue that her choice of footwear and her ability to squat without assistance during her third trimester raise suspicions.<\/p>\n
These doubts have led to calls for child welfare checks and inquiries into the well-being of Meghan’s children.<\/p>\n
In response to the controversy, Meghan has remained silent, leaving many to speculate about the truth behind the allegations.<\/p>\n
Lady C, a prominent figure with insider knowledge of the royal family, has hinted at the release of more information regarding Harry and Meghan’s children next spring.<\/p>\n
With the explosive nature of these allegations, it is clear that Meghan Markle’s motherhood continues to be a topic of intense scrutiny and speculation.<\/p>\n
As the public awaits further revelations, the debate surrounding the legitimacy of her pregnancies and the welfare of her children shows no signs of abating.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In a shocking revelation, Omid Scobie’s latest book, “Endgame,” has ignited a storm of controversy surrounding Meghan Markle’s motherhood. Scobie alleges that Meghan sent pictures of her children to the Sultan, fueling…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":16937,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16938","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-royal-family"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16938","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16938"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16938\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16939,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16938\/revisions\/16939"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16937"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16938"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16938"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16938"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}