Former host of Good Morning Britain, Piers Morgan, has once again expressed his disbelief in the words of the Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle.<\/p>\n

In a recent statement, Morgan hinted at a potential return to television by suggesting he could take over from Philip Schofield on This Morning.<\/p>\n

This comes after Morgan’s departure from his ITV show in 2021 following a string of contentious remarks about Meghan Markle.<\/p>\n

Taking to Twitter, Morgan posted a photo alongside Holly Willoughby, thanking everyone and teasing a potential comeback to ITV.<\/p>\n

Despite the possibility of a return to the small screen, Morgan made it clear that his skepticism towards Meghan Markle remains unwavering.<\/p>\n

His latest comments come in the wake of Meghan and Prince Harry’s reported harrowing encounter with paparazzi in New York City.<\/p>\n

During an episode of Piers Morgan Uncensored, he criticized the couple’s handling of the situation, suggesting they were inviting unnecessary attention by their actions.<\/p>\n

Questioning the authenticity of Meghan and Harry’s narrative, Morgan highlighted discrepancies in their account of events.<\/p>\n

He pointed out the questionable decision-making surrounding their movements in Manhattan, implying that their actions seemed calculated to portray them as victims of media intrusion.<\/p>\n

Morgan insinuated that the couple’s alleged car chase was a staged spectacle aimed at garnering sympathy and publicity.<\/p>\n

Support for Morgan’s skepticism came from New York Post columnist Miranda Devine, who echoed his sentiments regarding the dubious nature of Meghan and Harry’s story.<\/p>\n

Devine dismissed the couple’s version of events as implausible, emphasizing the abundance of surveillance in New York City that would have captured any genuine danger they faced.<\/p>\n

She suggested that Meghan and Harry orchestrated the incident to amplify their public image and generate media buzz.<\/p>\n

Devine further speculated that the couple’s actions were a deliberate ploy to divert attention away from their ordinary activities and towards a manufactured crisis.<\/p>\n

She contended that Meghan’s receipt of an award would not have attracted significant attention, whereas a sensationalized car chase narrative served to elevate their status in the public eye.<\/p>\n

Devine implied that the couple’s tactics were transparent attempts to manipulate the media for personal gain.<\/p>\n

As discussions surrounding Meghan and Harry’s credibility continue to unfold, opinions remain divided on the validity of their accounts.<\/p>\n

Piers Morgan’s outspoken skepticism and Miranda Devine’s critical analysis have shed light on the intricacies of celebrity narratives and the blurred lines between reality and performance.<\/p>\n

The ongoing saga involving the Duke and Duchess of Sussex serves as a reminder of the complexities inherent in navigating fame and public perception.<\/p>\n

In a media landscape saturated with intrigue and speculation, the saga of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s alleged car chase adds another layer of complexity to their already scrutinized lives.<\/p>\n

As the public grapples with conflicting narratives and competing interpretations, the truth behind the headlines remains elusive.<\/p>\n

The evolving drama surrounding the royal couple underscores the enduring fascination with celebrity culture and the enduring allure of sensational stories that captivate audiences worldwide.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Former host of Good Morning Britain, Piers Morgan, has once again expressed his disbelief in the words of the Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle. In a recent statement, Morgan hinted at a…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":32617,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32618","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-royal-family"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32618","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32618"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32618\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32619,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32618\/revisions\/32619"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/32617"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32618"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32618"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32618"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}