The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have found themselves at the center of a scandal after it was revealed that the photo used to announce the Duchess’s second pregnancy had been digitally altered.<\/p>\n

This revelation comes in the wake of the Princess of Wales admitting to experimenting with editing on a Mother’s Day photo featuring herself and her children.<\/p>\n

Insiders close to the royal couple have weighed in on the social media frenzy surrounding Kensington Palace’s photo editing mishap.<\/p>\n

While acknowledging that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex would have faced severe backlash if they had made a similar Photoshop error like Kate’s, they defended the Duchess, citing her meticulous attention to detail as a safeguard against such mistakes.<\/p>\n

A podcast has surfaced, alleging that the romantic black-and-white photo of the couple from 2021, announcing their second child, was indeed doctored.<\/p>\n

London-based photographer Miss Anne Harriman disclosed how he manipulated a shot of the couple in a field to include a willow tree in the background, showcasing the power of technology in image manipulation.<\/p>\n

During an interview on BBC Radio 3’s Private Passions program, Mr. Harriman marveled at the capabilities of technology, hinting at the extent to which images can be altered.<\/p>\n

Royal analyst Angela Levin criticized the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s team as hypocritical for altering the backdrop of their baby announcement photo while condemning others for similar actions.<\/p>\n

In a recovered recording from the Private Passions podcast, Mr. Harriman revealed that he provided remote guidance to the royal couple during the pandemic, assisting them with posing and capturing shots from a different location.<\/p>\n

The revelation raises questions about the authenticity of the idyllic scene depicted in the pregnancy announcement photo.<\/p>\n

Angela Levin’s rebuke of the Sussexes’ team’s hypocrisy highlights the double standards at play in the world of royal imagery.<\/p>\n

The controversy surrounding the altered photo has cast a shadow over the couple’s reputation, prompting speculation about the true nature of their public image and the authenticity of their intimate moments captured on camera.<\/p>\n

As discussions around the altered photo continue to unfold, the Princess of Wales is reportedly feeling the weight of public scrutiny following the social media uproar over Kensington Palace’s Mother’s Day post.<\/p>\n

The juxtaposition of these incidents underscores the challenges faced by public figures in maintaining authenticity and transparency in the digital age.<\/p>\n

The revelation of the photo editing scandal has reignited debates about the ethical boundaries of image manipulation in the realm of royal announcements.<\/p>\n

The controversy serves as a cautionary tale for public figures navigating the complexities of sharing personal milestones in an era where technology blurs the lines between reality and fiction.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have found themselves at the center of a scandal after it was revealed that the photo used to announce the Duchess’s second pregnancy had been digitally…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":32773,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32774","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-royal-family"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32774","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32774"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32774\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32775,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32774\/revisions\/32775"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/32773"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32774"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32774"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32774"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}