Amelia Wickstead, the renowned London-based fashion designer, is known for her elegant and feminine dresses, often in soft pastel shades.<\/p>\n

While not all of her designs are modest, she has become a favorite of Catherine, the Princess of Wales, and has even had the honor of having her creations worn by Meghan Markle.<\/p>\n

However, in the past, Wickstead made some controversial comments regarding Meghan’s wedding dress and overall appearance.<\/p>\n

Despite being speculated as a potential designer for the royal wedding dress, Wickstead lost out to Clare Waight Keller and the House of Givenchy, who created Meghan’s minimalist gown with a boat neck and three-quarter sleeves.<\/p>\n

This decision seemed to have left Wickstead feeling a bit salty.<\/p>\n

She reportedly claimed that Meghan’s dress was identical to one of her own designs, stating, “Apparently, a lot of commenters were saying, it’s an Amelia Wickstead dress.”<\/p>\n

Wickstead didn’t stop at critiquing the dress itself; she also commented on Meghan’s overall look on her wedding day.<\/p>\n

According to Wickstead, if you choose a simple design, the fit should be flawless.<\/p>\n

She expressed disappointment in the loose fit of Meghan’s wedding dress and even criticized the hairstyling, exclaiming, “I was like, hold the wisps of her hair back, it’s a royal wedding for God’s sake.”<\/p>\n

However, Wickstead later retracted her comments and issued an official statement on Instagram.<\/p>\n

In her statement, she expressed sadness over the commentary that had appeared in the press and online, clarifying that she believed Meghan looked absolutely beautiful on her wedding day.<\/p>\n

Wickstead also emphasized that she did not think Meghan’s wedding dress was a copy of any of her own designs.<\/p>\n

Amelia Wickstead wasn’t the only one to criticize Meghan’s wedding dress.<\/p>\n

Pop star Katy Perry also had something to say about it at the time.<\/p>\n

Perry suggested that Meghan needed an additional fitting, playfully winking at the camera as she offered her opinion.<\/p>\n

Many royal watchers joined in the criticism, describing Meghan’s wedding dress as plain, boring, and ill-fitting.<\/p>\n

Some online comments deemed it too simple and not regal enough.<\/p>\n

The criticism came swiftly and abundantly.<\/p>\n

Interestingly, Meghan’s choice of a pure white gown came as a surprise to the late Queen.<\/p>\n

Royal expert Katie Nicholl reveals in her book, “The New Royals,” that the Queen had reservations about the pure white color, expecting Meghan, as a divorcee, to opt for an off-white gown like Camilla did when she married Charles.<\/p>\n

The Queen believed that traditionally, a white dress symbolized a woman’s purity and virginity on her wedding day.<\/p>\n

According to a royal insider, Meghan enjoyed certain perks from designer brands, even during her time as a member of the royal family.<\/p>\n

Tina Brown’s book, “The Palace Papers: Inside the House of Windsor, The Truth and the Turmoil,” explains how Meghan used her now-defunct blog, The Tig, to receive luxury goods for free.<\/p>\n

Marketers of luxury brands saw her as someone genuinely interested in receiving their products.<\/p>\n

However, due to their royal status, there were deals that Meghan and Prince Harry had to decline.<\/p>\n

In conclusion, Amelia Wickstead’s initial critique of Meghan Markle’s wedding dress and appearance caused quite a stir.<\/p>\n

However, she later retracted her comments and clarified her admiration for Meghan’s beauty on her special day.<\/p>\n

The criticism surrounding Meghan’s dress and the surprise it brought to the late Queen’s expectations added further intrigue to the already captivating royal wedding saga.<\/p>\n

Additionally, insights into Meghan’s ability to acquire free luxury items through her blog shed light on the dynamics of her life as both a celebrity and a member of the royal family.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Amelia Wickstead, the renowned London-based fashion designer, is known for her elegant and feminine dresses, often in soft pastel shades. While not all of her designs are modest, she has become a…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3422,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3423","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-royal-family"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3423","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3423"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3423\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3424,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3423\/revisions\/3424"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3422"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3423"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3423"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3423"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}