In a recent book, Prince Harry shared an emotional account of the days following his wife Meghan Markle’s miscarriage.<\/p>\n

However, some royal fans are questioning the authenticity of their story, leading to a growing controversy.<\/p>\n

The doubts began with the description of the burial under a banyan tree.<\/p>\n

Critics pointed out that banyan trees do not grow in California, where the couple resides.<\/p>\n

Additionally, they questioned the claim that hospitals provide a box with a deceased fetus.<\/p>\n

Skeptics argued that it would be impossible to bury anything without proper tools, let alone with bare hands.<\/p>\n

People are rightfully upset, as this is not a topic to be taken lightly or used for fabrications.<\/p>\n

Meghan Markle’s account of the miscarriage also raised eyebrows.<\/p>\n

Instead of seeking immediate medical help when experiencing cramping, she allegedly knelt on the floor, holding her son Archie and crying with him.<\/p>\n

Critics argue that seeking medical assistance could have potentially prevented early labor.<\/p>\n

This contradicts Meghan’s previous op-ed for the New York Times, where she described feeling a sharp cramp after changing Archie’s diaper and dropping to the floor while humming a lullaby.<\/p>\n

Discrepancies between the Harry and Meghan documentary and Meghan’s written account further fueled skepticism.<\/p>\n

While the documentary showed a friend stating that Meghan fell outside, Meghan’s op-ed mentioned falling to her knees in the kitchen while holding Archie and singing to him.<\/p>\n

The confusion was compounded by Meghan’s mention of fishing crayons from underneath tables, adding to the messiness of the situation.<\/p>\n

Harry’s story has led some to question the validity of Meghan’s pregnancies altogether.<\/p>\n

One individual expressed doubt, stating that Meghan never appeared pregnant and even looked like she was wearing a fake belly.<\/p>\n

Another suggested the possibility of a scenario similar to Hilary Baldwin’s, where a surrogate miscarried, but Hilaria Baldwin pretended it was her own.<\/p>\n

The individual claimed that Meghan’s story seemed plagiarized from another book and mentioned a scene in a Netflix show where she gave a tour to her friend Abigail, experienced cramps, and miscarried.<\/p>\n

These allegations have raised concerns about potential falsehoods and the need for medical professionals and hospitals to address them.<\/p>\n

Critics also targeted Harry, dismissing his story as nonsense.<\/p>\n

A healthcare professional shared their expertise, stating that it is illegal for a hospital in the US to release a deceased body to anyone without proper protocols.<\/p>\n

They emphasized the frightening nature of the fantasy life portrayed by the couple.<\/p>\n

As the controversy continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how the doctor, pathologist, and hospital involved will respond to these allegations.<\/p>\n

The conflicting details and questionable elements in the couple’s accounts have only intensified public scrutiny.<\/p>\n

Whether it is a case of misinformation or a breach of legal and ethical standards, the truth must be uncovered to restore trust in the narrative surrounding this deeply personal experience.<\/p>\n

In conclusion, the recent revelations regarding Harry and Meghan’s account of their miscarriage have sparked controversy and skepticism among royal fans.<\/p>\n

The inconsistencies and questionable details have cast doubt on the authenticity of their story, prompting calls for clarification from medical professionals and further investigation into the matter.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In a recent book, Prince Harry shared an emotional account of the days following his wife Meghan Markle’s miscarriage. However, some royal fans are questioning the authenticity of their story, leading to…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3470,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3471","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-royal-family"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3471","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3471"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3471\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3472,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3471\/revisions\/3472"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3470"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3471"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3471"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3471"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}