Defiant Megan once again stirred controversy by launching a new lifestyle brand just moments before Prince William’s speech at Diana’s memorial event.<\/p>\n

The Sussexes unveiled their $100,000 Archibald Prize during this significant occasion, drawing attention away from the solemn proceedings.<\/p>\n

Royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams emphasized that the timing of such actions by the Sussexes is intentional, aimed at garnering maximum media coverage and overshadowing the royal family’s events.<\/p>\n

Megan’s calculated move to steal the spotlight reflects her eagerness for attention, even if it means disrespecting important occasions like the Diana Awards.<\/p>\n

Despite Harry’s public displays of admiration for his late mother, allowing his wife to overshadow a tribute to Diana raises questions about his priorities and loyalty.<\/p>\n

Critics argue that Megan’s actions demonstrate a lack of respect and decorum, especially when it comes to honoring Diana’s legacy.<\/p>\n

The couple’s relentless pursuit of fame and profit at the expense of royal traditions has drawn criticism from observers who question their motives and values.<\/p>\n

By leveraging their royal connections to promote commercial ventures, such as Megan’s lifestyle brand, the Sussexes have been accused of exploiting their titles for personal gain.<\/p>\n

The decision to launch a new venture during a memorial event dedicated to Diana further fuels speculation about their true intentions and priorities.<\/p>\n

Despite their attempts to position themselves as influential figures in both royal and commercial spheres, the Sussexes face backlash for their perceived disregard for tradition and decorum.<\/p>\n

Critics argue that Megan’s focus on commercial endeavors, such as selling jam and other products, undermines the dignity and reputation of the royal family.<\/p>\n

The couple’s actions have sparked debate about the appropriate use of royal titles and privileges, raising questions about their commitment to upholding royal traditions.<\/p>\n

As the Sussexes continue to navigate the complexities of balancing royal duties with commercial interests, their actions come under increasing scrutiny from both supporters and critics.<\/p>\n

The couple’s decision to capitalize on their royal connections for personal gain has polarized opinions and raised concerns about the future of the monarchy.<\/p>\n

Observers question whether the Sussexes’ pursuit of fame and fortune aligns with the values and responsibilities associated with their royal status.<\/p>\n

In light of the ongoing controversies surrounding the Sussexes’ commercial ventures and public appearances, the couple’s actions raise broader questions about the role of the monarchy in modern society.<\/p>\n

While some view their entrepreneurial pursuits as a reflection of changing times and attitudes towards royalty, others criticize the couple for prioritizing personal gain over royal duties.<\/p>\n

The Sussexes’ approach to blending royal traditions with commercial interests continues to spark debate and scrutiny within royal circles.<\/p>\n

As the Sussexes navigate the complexities of their dual roles as royals and entrepreneurs, their actions and decisions will continue to shape public perceptions and reactions.<\/p>\n

The couple’s willingness to challenge traditional norms and boundaries within the royal family has both admirers and detractors, highlighting the ongoing tensions between tradition and modernity.<\/p>\n

Whether the Sussexes’ commercial ventures will enhance or detract from their royal legacy remains a subject of intense speculation and debate in royal circles and beyond.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Defiant Megan once again stirred controversy by launching a new lifestyle brand just moments before Prince William’s speech at Diana’s memorial event. The Sussexes unveiled their $100,000 Archibald Prize during this significant…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":41271,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41272","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-royal-family"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41272","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41272"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41272\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":41273,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41272\/revisions\/41273"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/41271"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41272"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41272"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41272"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}