In recent weeks, an intriguing debate has captured the attention of many, as searches for Meghan Markle’s fake baby bump have skyrocketed by over 4,000%.<\/p>\n

A growing number of individuals are convinced that Markle’s pregnancy belly is nothing more than a cleverly disguised prop.<\/p>\n

Speculations abound, suggesting that the Duchess of Sussex may be concealing the use of a surrogate by wearing a moon bump product.<\/p>\n

Moon bumps, as described on the website moonbumps.com, are silicone or foam props commonly utilized in various industries such as stage and screen performance, advertising, and retail.<\/p>\n

They can also serve as a means to strengthen emotional bonds during the process of surrogacy or adoption.<\/p>\n

It is alleged that Markle may have been using these props, and some critics argue that she consistently wore bumps of different sizes throughout her pregnancy with Archie.<\/p>\n

Curiosity surrounding this controversy deepens as details emerge.<\/p>\n

It is claimed that only a select few had the opportunity to see Markle while she was carrying Lily, her second child.<\/p>\n

A staged preschool picture and another image featuring Harry and Meghan under a fabricated tree have raised suspicions.<\/p>\n

These photos were taken remotely by a London photographer who admitted to digitally inserting the tree behind the couple.<\/p>\n

Additionally, a royal aide reportedly spotted moon bumps on the ground in the cottage and on Markle’s bedroom floor.<\/p>\n

Eyewitness accounts have further fueled the speculation.<\/p>\n

Deanna Eppers, a Quora user, alleges that Markle’s bumps appeared to sway from side to side, deflate, and then quickly inflate, emitting a distinct popping sound.<\/p>\n

One video, capturing Markle greeting dogs during a royal visit, allegedly reveals these unusual movements.<\/p>\n

It is worth noting that some women who choose surrogacy wear moon bumps to enhance their own experience of pregnancy alongside the surrogate.<\/p>\n

These peculiarities also raise questions about Markle’s unconventional baby bump.<\/p>\n

Why did she not appear concerned about having a square-shaped bump or one that fell to her knees?<\/p>\n

Furthermore, reports suggest that Markle left a bump behind at a hotel when attending a party with Marcus Anderson in New York City.<\/p>\n

Some argue that these incidents indicate Markle’s lack of genuine pregnancy.<\/p>\n

Supporters of the theory also point out that Markle has not been seen visiting any doctors or obstetricians, which they consider as potential evidence of her alleged fake pregnancy.<\/p>\n

Others highlight her supposed constant use of hair dye and Botox treatments.<\/p>\n

Additionally, rumors circulate regarding an alleged contract with her ex-husband, where she demanded financial support for a postnatal personal trainer and nutritionist if they were to have a child together.<\/p>\n

Recently, a thought-provoking article by Alison P. Davis in The Cut sheds light on Meghan’s mysterious children.<\/p>\n

Davis recounts her experience with the royal couple, observing Archie’s excitement upon seeing his mother at the school gates.<\/p>\n

The young boy joyfully exclaims, “Mama, Mama, Mama,” as he runs towards her, leaving his lunchbox behind.<\/p>\n

In a heartwarming moment, Markle embraces him tightly, both closing their eyes, overwhelmed with genuine emotion.<\/p>\n

Amidst the ordinary routines of the school run, Markle demonstrates a humbling act of kindness in front of her young son.<\/p>\n

Davis reveals that the Duchess carries a black rucksack containing food and drinks for a homeless man who often sits on a nearby street corner.<\/p>\n

This gesture aims to teach Archie about compassion and empathy towards individuals from all walks of life.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In recent weeks, an intriguing debate has captured the attention of many, as searches for Meghan Markle’s fake baby bump have skyrocketed by over 4,000%. A growing number of individuals are convinced…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5976,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5977","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-royal-family"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5977","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5977"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5977\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5978,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5977\/revisions\/5978"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5976"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5977"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5977"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5977"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}