In a surprising turn of events, a royal photographer has made an explosive claim regarding Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, suggesting that she was seen holding a doll instead of her newborn son, Archie, during a widely publicized photo opportunity coinciding with her birthday.<\/p>\n

This assertion has ignited a storm of debate and raised serious questions about the authenticity of the royal family’s public appearances.<\/p>\n

The photographer, who chose to remain anonymous, shared this startling information during an interview with host Matt Wilkinson.<\/p>\n

According to the unnamed source, the media was misled about the timing of Meghan’s labor, implying that the entire event was meticulously orchestrated to fit a specific narrative.<\/p>\n

This revelation has sent shockwaves through the royal fanbase, prompting many to scrutinize the motives behind the actions of the Sussexes.<\/p>\n

On one side of the debate, critics have accused Meghan of crafting a carefully curated public persona, while supporters argue that the allegations are merely sensationalist tabloid fodder.<\/p>\n

The photographer asserted, \u201cThe whole thing was just stage-managed to suit them,\u201d hinting at a deeper level of manipulation within the royal household\u2019s public relations strategy.<\/p>\n

This isn\u2019t the first time Meghan has found herself embroiled in controversy.<\/p>\n

Her tumultuous relationship with the British press has been marked by legal battles against certain publications for alleged breaches of privacy and defamation.<\/p>\n

Given this backdrop, the latest claims have reignited discussions about the dynamics between the Sussexes and the media.<\/p>\n

Royal experts and commentators have quickly jumped into the fray, each offering their unique perspectives on the unfolding situation.<\/p>\n

Some suggest that the alleged doll incident reflects a broader issue within the royal family, where public appearances are carefully choreographed and often veiled in secrecy.<\/p>\n

Dr. Annabelle Wilkins, a royal historian, noted, \u201cThere\u2019s a long history of the royal family trying to control the narrative and present a certain image to the public.\u201d<\/p>\n

If the photographer’s allegations hold any truth, they could further tarnish the perception of transparency surrounding the Sussexes.<\/p>\n

Yet, not everyone is convinced.<\/p>\n

Supporters of Meghan argue that these claims may stem from a smear campaign fueled by those feeling threatened by her influence and popularity.<\/p>\n

Royal commentator Emily Chambers stated, \u201cMeghan has always been a target for those who are uncomfortable with a strong, independent woman in the royal family.\u201d<\/p>\n

As the controversy unfolds, it has once again placed the Duchess of Sussex in the limelight, with many questioning the authenticity of the royal family’s carefully crafted public image.<\/p>\n

The discussion surrounding this incident is expected to dominate headlines in the coming days, as both supporters and detractors of Meghan weigh in on the matter.<\/p>\n

Calls for a more thorough investigation into the alleged incident may arise, with some demanding greater transparency from the royal household.<\/p>\n

For now, however, Meghan has opted to remain silent on the issue, focusing instead on her charitable endeavors and family life.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In a surprising turn of events, a royal photographer has made an explosive claim regarding Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, suggesting that she was seen holding a doll instead of her newborn son,…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":67841,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-67842","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-royal-family"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67842","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67842"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67842\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":67843,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67842\/revisions\/67843"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/67841"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67842"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67842"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/history.airglee.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67842"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}